That's what she said
:banana:
That's what she said
Working on it
OK thanks that's all needed here... Let us know
We know flow but won't know power til we get a hard unit in hand for testing.
CARB? What's that? ;-)
bj
Totally unrelated question. So if you dont test it, how are you confident that it will give you what you want? Dont you have some simulation data? I have no idea how you come up with designs and validate them in your industry. Hence asking.
My guess would be plain and simple physics.
- A bigger inlet will have less restriction to the rotor pack
- Less resistance to the rotor pack= Mo flow
- Mo flow and less resistance= Mo efficient POWA :beer:
-Nick
Totally unrelated question. So if you dont test it, how are you confident that it will give you what you want? Dont you have some simulation data? I have no idea how you come up with designs and validate them in your industry. Hence asking.
Of course we test them. Flow bench, dyno, track. In this case we will compare it to:
GT500 07-12 stock
Same era with our Gen 1 VMP TVS
Same era with Trinity
2013 with Trinity
Same with ported Trinity
Finally, against similar class offerings in twin screw design, pending availability.
We know exactly what it does in theory, per CAD modeling and volume per the rapid prototype that you see in comparison photos.
I answer inquiries based on current time facts, not conjecture or pie-in-the-sky hopes.
So, when I say we'll know when we have a "hard copy" bolted to the car, don't mistake my not wanting to make a BS claim with waiting for reality. It's to justify and protect your investment and our word.
Great idea, don't you think?
Bj
and here I find myself considering a TVS for my coyote...
Are you guys going to be done with the current ones once this comes out?
Any difference on the outlet side underneath from the VMP Gen I TVS or FRPP TVS?
Will VMP be making a TB larger than 72mm for this application?