Used mustang prices...

Adower

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Messages
2,807
Location
SAC
Man I wonder what a fully forged sn95 modular cobra would go for.
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2020
Messages
1,362
Location
MI
I’m in OH and drove 4 hours to get mine a few months ago.. i watched marketplace religiously for months.
Someone drove 12 hours to get mine last weekend
 

Attachments

  • 187ED3EA-1872-4C6B-AC2B-1B3E6FB4B9CA.jpeg
    187ED3EA-1872-4C6B-AC2B-1B3E6FB4B9CA.jpeg
    475.6 KB · Views: 88

VenomousDSG

Get ready to fly!
Established Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
10,076
Location
Naperville, Il
I remember my 1999 GT i bought in 2002, 3 year old car with 39,000 miles on it, bought it for $13,000.

A 2019 GT right now with those miles are going for mid to high $30Ks, as much as they were new. Insane times.
 

Lambeau

Superfleck Moonbird
Established Member
Malt Liquor Mafia
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
9,899
Location
Rockwood Lodge
If I lived down south, I'd have a >1998 Mustang GT w/manual as my daily driver. IMHO, Mustangs have been one of the consistently best built vehicles America has ever produced.

I've owned a 1980, a couple 2001's, a 2005, and the current 2020. All very dependable vehicles. Somewhere around 240,000 miles between them all. Only new one I've ever owned is the 2020. Loved them all.

Thanks Flat Rock!
 
Last edited:

98 svt

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 16, 2005
Messages
24,010
Location
Massachoooosetts
If I lived down south, I'd have a >1998 Mustang GT w/manual as my daily driver. IMHO, Mustangs have been one of the consistently best built vehicles America has ever produced.

I've owned a 1980, a couple 2001's, a 2005, and the current 2020. All very dependable vehicles. Somewhere around 240,000 miles between them all. Only new one I've ever owned is the 2020. Loved them all.

Thanks Flat Rock!

But the 96-98 GTs were the turds of the bunch.
 

Detroit Iron

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
521
Location
Parts Unknown
This is not a good time for younger people to get into the car scene. Prices of everything went to the moon. Back in 1995, I was a 22 year old kid and got my first real job. A few months later I bought a used 91 coupe in mint condition with 19K miles on it for $8500. I don't think today's generation will have any chance at doing something similar.
 

sonicx

Shredder N Cheddar
Established Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2011
Messages
872
Location
Minnie
This is not a good time for younger people to get into the car scene. Prices of everything went to the moon. Back in 1995, I was a 22 year old kid and got my first real job. A few months later I bought a used 91 coupe in mint condition with 19K miles on it for $8500. I don't think today's generation will have any chance at doing something similar.
And that’s partly in my opinion why the car scene is dying and/ or why kids have switched over to a lot of rust rockets with loud exhaust and vendor stickers.

It’s not reasonable for kids for affordability as it once was, car : parts: gas: insurance.

No wonder kids lock themselves inside and play video games like forza. Heck of a lot cheaper.
 

Crimson2v

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,271
Location
North Carolina
This is not a good time for younger people to get into the car scene. Prices of everything went to the moon. Back in 1995, I was a 22 year old kid and got my first real job. A few months later I bought a used 91 coupe in mint condition with 19K miles on it for $8500. I don't think today's generation will have any chance at doing something similar.
In 1999 I was able to buy myself a 1970 Camaro that was in pretty good shape. I also was able to mod it, all on a high school budget, paid $5,500 for it. I couldn’t even think about the possibility of buying one in today’s market. Even rust buckets are going for high dollars. The car flippers/investors in my opinion killed the car scene for the future generation of upcoming gear heads.
0773CA83-6F3B-45B1-AE05-3B493314E4F1.jpeg
 
Last edited:

TerminatoRS

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Party Liquor Posse
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
2,403
Location
Wisconsin
What was bad about them? Serious question as i dont know. I thought 94/95 were the ones to avoid? Is 99-04 that much better?

I drove a couple 98 GTs and they seemed ok to me. they sure looked good.
94-95 still used the 5.0.
96-98 GT went to 4.6 2v rated at 215-225hp.
99-04 GT was also 4.6 2v, but with PI (performance improved) heads, cams, and intake. I thought they had a different compression ratio too thanks to different pistons.

Even though the 94-95 GT didn't really make any more power than the 96-98, they had the more desirable 5.0 which seems to have saved them from falling into the same "turd" category as far as I can tell.
 

q6543

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
1,994
Location
midwest
Keep context... I graduated in 99 also... I made like $5 an hour... now I make closer to $30

I had a 1989 black mustang gt 5.0 I bought for $4300... I could probably buy an even nicer one than I had, today for 20-25k.

So nothing actually changed.
People post ads from the 60s muscle cars for 3 or 4k... I'm like.. of course... they made 1 dollar an hour.
Context.

That said I'm expecting my next raise to be SIGNIFICANT.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top