why is a/f 11.4?
The wideband wasnt hooked up. So thats not right.
why is a/f 11.4?
Dont get too excited. Its extremely easy to make a dyno read however you want it to read. You could make these "dyno" numbers with a bone stock mustang pretty easily.
Im not saying its BS, but I havent seen these engines respond this well to basic bolt-on. So either we have an aggressive tune made by a very skilled tuner, or we have some inflation of the results.
Which brings me to an important question. Would this happen to have been on a hub dyno (i.e. dynapack, etc).
This being in Brake HP and not Wheel HP would largely explain the high numbers.
Did you watch the video?Which brings me to an important question. Would this happen to have been on a hub dyno (i.e. dynapack, etc).
This being in Brake HP and not Wheel HP would largely explain the high numbers.
Dont get butthurt.
Given all the companies that have been working with these cars I wouldnt be surpised if they have gotten pretty damn close to the max youll be able to make on pump gas with basic bolt-ons. There is only so much you can do with tuning.
From what Ive seen mods like these are usually going to be pulling around 400 on a DYNOJET, which is already inflated beyond real world results due to being an inertia dyno. Making another 40hp on top of that sounds very unlikely.
I never said it was brake hp, I was ASKING if it was.
I just now watched the video and saw that it was not on a hub dyno for sure.
As far as dynojets being with 5%; that is on the lower end of what I have experienced. More like 10%, sometimes even more.
Realistic load? Far from it. The inertia of the drum is a miserable excuse for a proper brake dyno, and directly leads to it not only being inaccurate but also makes it borderline useless for tuning.
The wideband wasnt hooked up. So thats not right.
Dont get too excited. Its extremely easy to make a dyno read however you want it to read. You could make these "dyno" numbers with a bone stock mustang pretty easily.
Im not saying its BS, but I havent seen these engines respond this well to basic bolt-on. So either we have an aggressive tune made by a very skilled tuner, or we have some inflation of the results.
Which brings me to an important question. Would this happen to have been on a hub dyno (i.e. dynapack, etc).
This being in Brake HP and not Wheel HP would largely explain the high numbers.
Okay...How much is the tune and where can I get it? I'm currently running a 93r Bama tune and would love to compare the tunes.
SAE was 422/409.
Can't wait for L&M to release their TB.
I'd also like to see what E85 can do in one of these cars. From what I saw during tuning, they could use a bit more timing (and octane to match). E85 *might* be the hot ticket.
I could have spent another 4 hours playing with the cams. LOL
Maybe next time.
I absloutely LOVE these new 5.0's!
The new L&M 5.0 TB just completed testing and will be released in 2-3 weeks.
Gain over Stock 5.0 TB is 10rwhp and 25 torque.Complete w/electronics & ready to bolt on,with stock driveability.hydro
424 rwtq out of a 5.0L? yeah, ok. nice happy dyno they have there. I dont give a shit what engine you have that kind of torque all motor in a 5.0L street engine isnt gonna happen.
an engine is an engine is an engine. I dont give a **** what technology is applied. the engine doesnt care what name is on the valve cover. 424 rwtq out of an all motor 5.0L is impossible. its a happy dyno.lol wut? I'm assuming you don't know much about these engines and the technology. That's alright, lol