That f1a is a seriously mean blower. I think you're going to be very happy with it.
smashedheadcat said:I say go F1a. There is no need to change cams. The cams in the '03 cobra are set to help build low/mid range torque. Which is exactly what you should do with the big F1a blower. Butcher ran his car deep into the 9's (faster than the nitrous'd KB cars) with stock cams and a stock pullied f1a blower. Everyone seems to point the finger at the centrifical blower when it comes to weak low rpm torque. Anyone that knows anything about shaping power curves needs to look at runner length. The procharger supplied sheet metal intake has runners about 2 inches long. That is in the "EXTREME" short runner range. So, shorten the runners, lose low rpms power, and gain it in high rpms. Look at the dyno graphs of procharged cars....... nothing until 5000rpms or so, then the powercurve takes off. So, a 2 inch intake runner starts to become effective at 5000rpms... Now, instead of addressing the runner length problem, they do what any terminator owner would do to increase torque..... add boost. So, here comes the small pulley, and the belt slip.... so with the slipping belt, weak low rpm torque numbers...... and a no help from ATI, the R&D owners ditched them. Nobody is addressing the problem with these blowers. In order to build more power in the low/mid range, you need to add runner length. So, ditch the factory intercooler setup, get a real intake on there (99-01 cobra intake or sullivan for race only) and keep the stock pulley on it. Run an air to air intercooler on there with a 12rib setup. Sure, it's pricey, but you can find used procharged kits in the classifieds for just over $2000, so in the end, it won't be too bad. This setup would produce power in the 700rwhp range with no slip. I almost did this instead of going turbo. Kind of wish I did sometimes.
smashedheadcat said:I say go F1a. There is no need to change cams. The cams in the '03 cobra are set to help build low/mid range torque. Which is exactly what you should do with the big F1a blower. Butcher ran his car deep into the 9's (faster than the nitrous'd KB cars) with stock cams and a stock pullied f1a blower. Everyone seems to point the finger at the centrifical blower when it comes to weak low rpm torque. Anyone that knows anything about shaping power curves needs to look at runner length. The procharger supplied sheet metal intake has runners about 2 inches long. That is in the "EXTREME" short runner range. So, shorten the runners, lose low rpms power, and gain it in high rpms. Look at the dyno graphs of procharged cars....... nothing until 5000rpms or so, then the powercurve takes off. So, a 2 inch intake runner starts to become effective at 5000rpms... Now, instead of addressing the runner length problem, they do what any terminator owner would do to increase torque..... add boost. So, here comes the small pulley, and the belt slip.... so with the slipping belt, weak low rpm torque numbers...... and a no help from ATI, the R&D owners ditched them. Nobody is addressing the problem with these blowers. In order to build more power in the low/mid range, you need to add runner length. So, ditch the factory intercooler setup, get a real intake on there (99-01 cobra intake or sullivan for race only) and keep the stock pulley on it. Run an air to air intercooler on there with a 12rib setup. Sure, it's pricey, but you can find used procharged kits in the classifieds for just over $2000, so in the end, it won't be too bad. This setup would produce power in the 700rwhp range with no slip. I almost did this instead of going turbo. Kind of wish I did sometimes.
smashedheadcat said:Just to be different I guess. I love my turbo kit, but I also love the sound of the f1a! It would have been cheaper as well.
exactly why i would only go with a pos. displacement blower or my turbos. i hate the actual dialing them in part with the turbos but every time i drive my car i fall back in love. tha turbo powa is amazing :rockon:drohan8592 said:for a street car (driven every day) isay kenne bell. that's what i have. i put down 612 HP 572 TQ, 17 PSI, 18 degrees timing. and we let off at 6100 rpm because of spark blowout. what really matters is how much space is under the curve. I.E. hp and tq. when i spray a 75 shot i dare a 17 psi procharger to step up.
no doubt bro !!! a huge turbo is definitely in this car's future. but then it will be a dedicated drag car. and in no way shape or form am i taking away from a turbo street car. i'm just saying, slapping on a positive displacement or turbo is worlds better than a centri. at least on these animals. nuff said !!!!!!!!!!!!!longrodLX said:exactly why i would only go with a pos. displacement blower or my turbos. i hate the actual dialing them in part with the turbos but every time i drive my car i fall back in love. tha turbo powa is amazing :rockon:
this is true. MMFF overspun the procharger 03 cobra by spinning the blower up to 7,200. they spit the belt off and said it was due to the fact of them overspinning the blower. the F1A is a bad ass blower, but not for a terminator.FordRacing200 said:Thats funny because MM&FF had a feature article awhile back on the F1A and revving it beyond 6k made it slower, it was faster at 6k then at 7500rpm
drohan8592 said:for a street car (driven every day) isay kenne bell. that's what i have. i put down 612 HP 572 TQ, 17 PSI, 18 degrees timing. and we let off at 6100 rpm because of spark blowout. what really matters is how much space is under the curve. I.E. hp and tq. when i spray a 75 shot i dare a 17 psi procharger to step up.
no thats not what hes saying. thats just what he has. and yes the KB is a far superior blower on the street and at the track over the F1 or any other centri for that matter.smashedheadcat said:So what you're trying to say is that your 17psi KB car needs a 75 shot to beat a 17psi procharged car and you still call your blower superior?? If that's what floats your boat, more power to ya.
longrodLX said:no thats not what hes saying. thats just what he has. and yes the KB is a far superior blower on the street and at the track over the F1 or any other centri for that matter.
smashedheadcat said:So what you're trying to say is that your 17psi KB car needs a 75 shot to beat a 17psi procharged car and you still call your blower superior?? If that's what floats your boat, more power to ya.
do you have any idea what the triangle car has done to it ?? and how much boost they're running. probably not. look at the muscle mustangs and fast fords test on the procharger. this is a good comparison. for a normal terminator. did they even get into the 10's ??blowngt said:I think that the guys at Triangle would agrue that point.......
longrodLX said:no thats not what hes saying. thats just what he has. and yes the KB is a far superior blower on the street and at the track over the F1 or any other centri for that matter.
longrodLX said:no thats not what hes saying. thats just what he has. and yes the KB is a far superior blower on the street and at the track over the F1 or any other centri for that matter.