:shrug:
Last edited:
mysticsvt said:I respect everyones opinion on the forums yet also realize there are stupid people all over the place. I also maybe stupid or ignorant(there is a difference) to some people and I'm fine with that. There are multiple definitions for the word "RICE". It's an opinion based theory. However...mine goes alittle like this...
1. Eurolights on a mustang...RICE
2. If you have a STAULKER kit.....ur RICE
3. If you have lights under your car...RICE
4. If you put Cobra badges on your V6 OR GT...RICE
5. If your rear wind sticks up 2 floors....RIIIICEEE
6. If you put ANY body parts on your car that did not come on a mustang and ANY year including rims.....RICE
What I also think is RICE is instead of building a track car some people build a sleeper street car out of a family car. Which of course...looks GHEY. But hey its fast rite?!? With the money installed you could have bought a nice muscle car and gotten alittle respect. I'm sick of all the civics, del soles etc etc etc trying to be something that they are not...SPORTS CARS. They isnt anything sporty looking about a Neon, or Tauras, or EVO. What isnt rice is the real imports and Euros like BMWs, Supras, Evos, etc. Power, handling and weight reduction..not FART CANS with no power to back them up! OK..I'm getting off topic and apologise..rant is over-Shane :shrug:
02gsxr600 said:I say they are both good. However, I'd go with a supercharger for the street. A SC will give you a ton of TQ right off the line, where a turbo has to spool up at high RPM's in order to be efficient. Do you really wanna be redlining your car everywhere you go?
A turbo will make more power, but IMO is more for track use. Plus I love the feel of a SC because of its instant power right of the line. Stick with a SC, you'll probably like the feel of it more.
longrodLX said:once you get the dynos spinning that fast you lose load. it keeps pulling on the street and maf and fuel are fine