:shrug: I like them both tough call for me
Win7ermute said:Hell, I think Hole were actually a better band then Nirvana, as least the Miss World album.
vegaspackerfan said:I would loved to have been at the Hole concert where someone threw shotgun shells on stage and Courtney went ape shit and walked off....LOL....
VPF
Win7ermute said:Nirvana are over-rated as hell, for the simple fact that numb-nut hemingway'ed himself. Hell, I think Hole were actually a better band then Nirvana, as least the Miss World album.
Grohl now > Cobain then.
Pearl Jam way > then Nirvana.
DBK said:You are smoking total rocks on this one. Foo Fighters are a very entertaining band. Nevermind is one of the best records ever, regardless of decade, period.
Smells Like Teen Sprit, In Bloom, Come as you Are, Breed, Lithium, Polly, Lounge Act, Stay Away, On a Plain, Something in the Way...you're talking about 10 songs on a 12 song record being genre defining classics.
People that compare Nirvana and Pearl Jam Steve Albini wouldn't piss on Eddie Vedder's whining from a rooftop.
And for the record, Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Alice in Chains, and Soundgarden all represent completely different kinds of music and got lumped together because of the timing. Listen to In Utero and tell me Nirvana had absolutely anything to do with those other bands...Chris Cornell remains a serious talent and Badmotorfinger was a fantastic record.
Njc0las said:I got the video.
Njc0las said:Territorial Pissings
vegaspackerfan said:It is your responsibility to post that.
yea, ok. read the FF songs i posted and tell me they dont sound similar at all. even the new single(the pretender, good song) sounds damn similar to the songs i listed. take the blinders off, i think most people can see what im saying here. your probably gonna post some big schpeil about "blah blah blah foo fighters own joo blah blah blah", and refuse to believe that im actually a fan of them, but i really am. doesnt make the songs sound any different though.Win7ermute said:Thats like saying that every RHCP song sounds the same.
LMAO!!! thats the classic excuse to fall back on when you have no arguement. see: metallica. ever think they just wanted a different sound? no, thats too positive, they must have sold out!!!2001blkR said:Has anybody actually listened to Nirvana before the nevermind album? They sound nothing like they were on that album. They were bought out end of story. Oh yeah, Dave puts on a great show nowadays.
snakedoctor said:NIRVANA SUCKS!!! The Foo Fighters are so so.
2001blkR said:Has anybody actually listened to Nirvana before the nevermind album? They sound nothing like they were on that album. They were bought out end of story. Oh yeah, Dave puts on a great show nowadays.
Coiled03 said:I see no one has answered my question. WGAF what kind of "musical impact" a band had?
Just because a band had a greater "impact", that doesn't make them a better band from a musical standpoint.
Ry_Trapp0 said:LMAO!!! thats the classic excuse to fall back on when you have no arguement. see: metallica. ever think they just wanted a different sound? no, thats too positive, they must have sold out!!!
RFH said:actually it does
Especially when they have albums that have sold over 10 million, Im betting all the foos cds combined arent that high.