Explosions at UK Ariana Grande concert. Fatalties confirmed.

[SolarYellow]

Question:

When you walk into a big city like NYC and see the police with fully auto weapons or the added security in airports since 9-11-01, who is to blame? Christians?

 

[BRNG ITT]

Still trying to figure out what a Constituition is.

Priorities.

It's the ability to immediately understand The Constitution without conscious reasoning; as in Constitutional Intuition.

 

[helloWorld]

Rush Limbaugh did have a pretty good question today. If Muslims are so peaceful, why is everybody afraid of publicly criticizing them? If Christians are so dangerous, why is nobody afraid of publicly criticizing them?

 

[VenomVeins]

The internet is buzzing heavily this morning with this news after manchester went into full lockdown:

Kill them all.

 

[Blk04L]

Question:

When you walk into a big city like NYC and see the police with fully auto weapons or the added security in airports since 9-11-01, who is to blame? Christians?

There was a documentary from kazakhstan that the Jews were involved in 9/11.

Really? Go look up Mattis' last press conference. He outlines how the president gave him permission to move ahead from their current plan of displacement and attrition against ISIS to a plan of, and I quote "anhiliation." He doesn't want any left alive to spread out and do what just happened in Manchester. That is a very bold statement to make and battle plan to enact as any recent president since RR. Our guys are going to kill every last one they find in Raqqa and Im jealous.

Sent from my SM-G935P using the svtperformance.com mobile app

Really. Thanks, I'll look into that. Was on Foxnews this AM/yesterday and didn't see anything about that.

 

[svtfocus2cobra]

There was a documentary from kazakhstan that the Jews were involved in 9/11.



Really. Thanks, I'll look into that. Was on Foxnews this AM/yesterday and didn't see anything about that.

No problem. Tried finding a specific funny video clip of it but I can't for the life of me right now.

Sent from my SM-G935P using the svtperformance.com mobile app

 

[BrunotheBoxer]

*face palm*

**** islam and **** those belly dancers.

 

[SolarYellow]

There was a documentary from kazakhstan that the Jews were involved in 9/11.

The latest Muslim terrorist incident was categorized as a Jewish false flag event by a few weirdos.

 

[Deceptive]

**** islam and **** those belly dancers.

Woah! Let's not go full potato. I'd make some infidel jihadists with this one.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Screw-Rice]

The internet is buzzing heavily this morning with this news after manchester went into full lockdown:

Kill them all.

Yeah you didn't see the Muslim taxi drivers pics, because Cosmo assumed the Sikh drivers were Muslim and got hammered on assuming they are the same, lol.

Woah! Let's not go full potato. I'd make some infidel jihadists with this one.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Same here, don't know where she stands on anything, but just in that pic I see a few things that would cause her to catch a bunch of rocks or acid to the dome if she was devout.

 

[VenomVeins]

Excellent article and read on this situation:

"After the terror, the platitudes. And the hashtags. And the candlelit vigils. And they always have the same message: ‘Be unified. Feel love. Don’t give in to hate.’ The banalities roll off the national tongue. Vapidity abounds. A shallow fetishisation of ‘togetherness’ takes the place of any articulation of what we should be together for – and against. And so it has been after the barbarism in Manchester. In response to the deaths of more than 20 people at an Ariana Grande gig, in response to the massacre of children enjoying pop music, people effectively say: ‘All you need is love.’ The disparity between these horrors and our response to them, between what happened and what we say, is vast. This has to change.

It is becoming clear that the top-down promotion of a hollow ‘togetherness’ in response to terrorism is about cultivating passivity. It is about suppressing strong public feeling. It’s about reducing us to a line of mourners whose only job is to weep for our fellow citizens, not ask why they died, or rage against their dying. The great fear of both officialdom and the media class in the wake of terror attacks is that the volatile masses will turn wild and hateful. This is why every attack is followed by warnings of an ‘Islamophobic backlash’ and heightened policing of speech on Twitter and gatherings in public: because what they fundamentally fear is public passion, our passion. They want us passive, empathetic, upset, not angry, active, questioning. They prefer us as a lonely crowd of dutiful, disconnected mourners rather than a real collective of citizens demanding to know why our fellow citizens died and how we might prevent others from dying. We should stop playing the role they’ve allotted us.

As part of the post-terror narrative, our emotions are closely policed. Some emotions are celebrated, others demonised. Empathy – good. Grief – good. Sharing your sadness online – great. But hatred? Anger? Fury? These are bad. They are inferior forms of feeling, apparently, and must be discouraged. Because if we green-light anger about terrorism, then people will launch pogroms against Muslims, they say, or even attack Sikhs or the local Hindu-owned cornershop, because that’s how stupid and hateful we apparently are. But there is a strong justification for hate right now. Certainly for anger. For rage, in fact. Twenty-two of our fellow citizens were killed at a pop concert. I hate that, I hate the person who did it, I hate those who will apologise for it, and I hate the ideology that underpins such barbarism. I want to destroy that ideology. I don’t feel sad, I feel apoplectic. Others will feel likewise, but if they express this verboten post-terror emotion they risk being branded as architects of hate, contributors to future terrorist acts, racist, and so on. Their fury is shushed. ‘Just weep. That’s your role.’

The post-terror cultivation of passivity speaks to a profound crisis of – and fear of – the active citizen. It diminishes us as citizens to reduce us to hashtaggers and candle-holders in the wake of serious, disorientating acts of violence against our society. It decommissions the hard thinking and deep feeling citizens ought to pursue after terror attacks. Indeed, in some ways this official post-terror narrative is the unwitting cousin of the terror attack itself. Where terrorism pursues a war of attrition against our social fabric, seeking to rip away bit by bit our confidence and openness and sense of ourselves as free citizens, officialdom and the media diminish our individuality and our social role, through instructing us on what we may feel and think and say about national atrocities and discouraging us from taking responsibility for confronting these atrocities and the ideological and violent rot behind them. The terrorist seeks to weaken our resolve, the powers-that-be want to sedate our emotions, retire our anger, reduce us to wet-eyed performers in their post-terror play. It’s a dual assault on the individual and society.

That the post-terror narrative is fundamentally about taming our passion and politics is clear from its sidelining of all issues of substance. We are actively warned against asking difficult questions about 21st-century society and why it has this violence in it, this nihilism in it. Question the wisdom of multiculturalism, of refusing to elevate one culture over another and instead encouraging people to live in their own cultural bubbles, and you’re racist. Wonder if the obsession with combatting ‘Islamophobia’ might have given rise to a situation where some Muslims, especially younger ones, cannot handle ridicule of their religion, and… well, you’re ‘Islamophobic’. As for immigration: this is the great unmentionable; you’re a fascist even for thinking about it. The post-terror narrative that barks ‘You must empathise!’ also says, implicitly, and sometimes explicitly, ‘You mustn’t think! You mustn’t ask those questions or say that thing.’ And so in their response to terrorism, they erect an intellectual forcefield around some of the problems that might, just might, be contributing to that terrorism.

We need unity, they say. Unity’s their buzzword. But this is substanceless, too. Unity around what? Unity against what? What are our values? Who is the enemy of those values? Don’t ask. Don’t think. It is wrong to have core values in a society built on diversity, apparently, and we mustn’t ever suggest that any particular ideology poses a threat to those values, because that might involve ‘punching down’, singling people out, etc. We end up with a unity of shallow feeling, a union of highly individuated mourners, not a unity around real ideals and things and vision. Their cry of unity is a lie. The fact is there are people in our society willing to attack us, others who will think those attacks are justified, and others still who will apologise for those attacks by saying they’re a product of ‘Islamophobia’ or Western intervention overseas. We are so far from united. We are deeply divided. But you cannot say that. ‘Weep, don’t think.’
Stop and think about how strange it is, how perverse it is, that more than 20 of our citizens have been butchered and we are basically saying: ‘Everyone calm down. Love is the answer.’ Where’s the rage? If the massacre of children and their parents on a fun night out doesn’t make you feel rage, nothing will. The terrorist has defeated you. You are dead already."

 

[Zemedici]

Question:

When you walk into a big city like NYC and see the police with fully auto weapons or the added security in airports since 9-11-01, who is to blame? Christians?

well to be fair we all know we dont have atheists to blame.

 

[Sinister04L]

I like these posts. They are like the grilled cheese of the internet.

If I took them all serious, I would of been blown up by now when I go to the gas station or grocery store. Because according to y'all, being a Muslim comes with the prerequisite that you have a bomb strapped to your chest.

Saying "would of" is surely a bombable offense.

 

[hoamskilet]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/24/leaked-pictures-show-bomb-used-manchester-attack/

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[DAVESVT2000]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She's Indian I believe

 

[tones_RS3]

Big Poppa, you are free to join Katy Perry, Ariana Grande, and all the other leftists in going to the Middle East and hugging it out with them and singing Kumbaya. Return and tell us how it goes.

I love it James. Tell it like it is bro.
"IF" he returns. LOL

I live in a heavily populated southern coastal city. It's beach bums, flip flops, and board shorts 24/7 here. As a city we are more progressive and generally moderate than either direction. We also share a large city wide belief in libertarian-ism. Something about the weather, conditions, and location make people relax and respect each others rights in a very different way. "You do you and I'll do me" is the mantra here.
But I am a republican first and foremost. I just stray to the middle instead of everyone's crack pipe far right ideologies that swing around here like 80 year old man penis.

Double speak much?!?!
Liberals are great for that.

 

[Deceptive]

She's Indian I believe

Potato, padildo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[03cobra#694]

Woah! Let's not go full potato. I'd make some infidel jihadists with this one.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'd give her the best 5 seconds of my life. Lol

 

[SolarYellow]

HUGE BUSH!

 

[svtfocus2cobra]

HUGE BUSH!

Are you speaking from experience... or are you saying there is a place where you can input someone's name and find information and let's just say revealing photos of them? I have always wondered if such a mechanism exists in this day and age of advanced technological innovation.