Who cares. The vendor and manufacturer are selling a tool for off road racing vehicles. The customer's action is not their responsibikity.
Should Glock, Smith & Wesson, etc be sues for homicides? Should Rustoleum and Krylon be sued because some idiot is dumb enough to sniff paint?
Improper use of a product does not lean on the shoulders of a manufacturer.
I'm going to go use a hair dryer while taking a shower now. I will make sure to keep the breaker from flipping. Do you think I can sue the manufacturer of the hairdryer if I am electrocuted?
Sent from my [trashcan S5] using the svtperformance.com mobile app
I’m not saying I agree with it but it was FAR too much of an “off-road use only” wink and a nudge situation.
Really I bet if they hadn’t bought Bully Dog SCT might not even be involved. If I remember correctly it’s all the coal rolling diesel dickheads that got the EPA’s attention to start with. Several other diesel programmers have already been smacked down
The federal government grabbing you by the balls is a whole lot different than joe blow consumer suing you