matt. would you say the 4.2LC is within reach yet? also i know you cant say much but can we expect 1300+rwhp capabilities with the proper built motor, cams, heads, etc? and will it be way far off price wise compared to the 3.6LC
It is very close to being released we have couple being sent out for testing should make some big numbers 1300 is definitely within the realm of what it can do. Price range not sure but shouldn't be that much more than the 3.6LC.
For an all out "Blow out build" it HAS to be turbo's.
Just look what happens to this 4.0L Whipple and what the driver says at 2:40 in the video below. :-D
[youtube_browser]bIUy9AGThgA[/youtube_browser]
Want to make it out to Tx this fall ? Shootout going on. Customer has the same setup as you. FRPP SB, GT cams, and is converting to E85. I'd like different cams in there, but what can you do ?KB w/750 hp and TQ = 10.0/9.99
TT/SC with 900-1000 hp and tq = 9.50/9.49
Hook and Book, spinning aint winning........Tonys car is badass for sure but it takes alot more than anyone see's to make it work. I love Tony's car and he's one of a very few with the shear gumption to make it work with cost thrown to the wayside! Kudos T!
KB w/750 hp and TQ = 10.0/9.99
TT/SC with 900-1000 hp and tq = 9.50/9.49
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is my point!
STCJCK: How many people did you say have TT cars running mid 9's with a street tire and a 6 spd?
At the risk of being flamed as a know-nothing newbie I'm still going to ask: Can a turbo and a supercharger be attached to the same engine?
Yes, compound boost.At the risk of being flamed as a know-nothing newbie I'm still going to ask: Can a turbo and a supercharger be attached to the same engine?
Hmmm. I'm guessing that mating a turbo with an sc to the same engine has proven to be a lot of trouble or ineffective or not as good as tt or ts since I don't hear about people doing it.
I think he is spinning and still winning, no?
....I think I should have played more in the trash talk thread.....
Cool. UPR has a Mustang Dyno. Thunder has an older model Dynojet.
And Jake's Dyno, well that was your most recent run and that's the Revan Lund Motorsports Dyno at Power By the Hour. I'm just saying.
Once Jake gets the Super Snake repaired (Boss R1 Tranny) it will be going on to the same dyno so we can put all of the comparisons side by side as to dyno power. Heck, let's put both cars on the same day. Your car is for drag racing and the Super Snake is a Mile Racer. We had intended to do both but the owner of the Super Snake decided to go a single direction.
Regardless, both superchargers make power. You're on one side with Whipple and I chose Kenne Bell. As for the Ford Racing and Shelby thing well Shelby still sells Kenne Bell 2.8 and 3.6 Superchargers for Super Snakes and retail.
Sometimes its just about margin.
Ok..not talking shit but....9.49 at 151 is a far cry from 9.99 at 140 ....I really don't think 150 shot is going to net Andy 10+mph and .5 seconds...Just Say'in
Oh ya..Race weight 4160lbs....also went 9.55 at 155 in the middle of the summer(in Florida).
As far as I know the compound kit works pretty well...
Most HP
KOTS 2010 Winner
Fastest 6-speed(that I know of)
Will blow the tires off at 100mph plus(cool factor)
Quiet and drives like stock.
My vote of course is compoud boost...biased HELLION YES...History shows why.
My car is back up and running...on the dyno tomorrow and hopefully at the track next Friday.
No, you don't sell KB because we DON'T sell to you.
Can't wait to race the Supersnake on the dyno.. LOL
How about this comparison.
Our 500: [email protected] at 21psi. That's a 4" upper and 10% lower.
Supersnake: No track times. Dyno queen..:loser: