No that is not cool. Not cool at all. LMAOIf you can't afford one, cool. If you can, cool.
No that is not cool. Not cool at all. LMAOIf you can't afford one, cool. If you can, cool.
300KA 900hp Mustang that is garnering this much hate within 18 hours of release is a prime example of how the internet has ****ed over our world. lol What is there to hate about this?
It'll be more than a handful.
lolol You can barely R&D one for $35k...before incurring any other expenses....or actually physically putting one together.
A 900hp Mustang that is garnering this much hate within 18 hours of release is a prime example of how the internet has ****ed over our world. lol What is there to hate about this?
If you can't afford one, cool. If you can, cool. If you want one, cool. If you don't want one, cool.
This is a badass piece of machinery. Takes a $600k GT3 car, cuts the cost in half, and makes it street legal.
The new transaxle is $35K just by itself.But in my eyes Ford took a S550 GT500, removed the expensive/heavy DCT trans and replaced that with the rear transaxle(which Corvettes have had for how long?), But again Ford took the lazy/cheaper way out.
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
You are so severely understating the complexity of everything packed into this vehicle. You have Multimatic, one of the most prestigious racecar builders and engineering firms out there saying getting a transaxle to fit in a Mustang was the hardest thing they had to do. The Corvette is designed every generation to use a transaxle, the Mustang is not hence why everything has to be re-engineered to make one work. Cantilevered suspension is a style of suspension, just like MacPherson and double wishbone. It's going to look pretty much the same in every car utilizing whatever type, but is going to be engineered differently for every vehicle. How many cars do you know that are street legal that have this type of suspension? You're downplaying one of the most exotic aspects of the car's engineering.
I get the car is not for everyone, but wow... Mustangs sure do bring out the illogical hate from members here. @13COBRA was spot on. The internet ruined everyone.
The new transaxle is $35K just by itself.
Talk about taking the lazy/cheap way out...
I'll be impressed if this car matches gt3 performance since I'm not 100% sure if the GT does and multimatic didn't have their hands tied to a specific chassis on that car.It'll be more than a handful.
lolol You can barely R&D one for $35k...before incurring any other expenses....or actually physically putting one together.
A 900hp Mustang that is garnering this much hate within 18 hours of release is a prime example of how the internet has ****ed over our world. lol What is there to hate about this?
If you can't afford one, cool. If you can, cool. If you want one, cool. If you don't want one, cool.
This is a badass piece of machinery. Takes a $600k GT3 car, cuts the cost in half, and makes it street legal.
Cantilever?
21 year old kid built a V8 swapped Cantilever FRS on the weekend...
All sorts of dudes do kits for cars and trucks.
And I watched one of my techs build a tube frame for the front of an S2000 in one night. There's people who can do all sorts of crazy shit and it is impressive, but if it is so easy then why doesn't every performance car come equipped with it? I guess Koenigsegg went with an inferior suspension setup on their cars as well.
There is a reason that no one does that.Now do the same thing for a car under $50k at +100k units a year.
Cost and Production Scalability.
Hence my "meh". It's a low rate bespoke supercar. Of course they can shove a bunch of cool features and technology into it. Now do the same thing for a car under $50k at +100k units a year.
As I mentioned in the other thread, I saw in a video of the reveal that it has 345s in the rear and 325s in the front!