That is much more of a comparison than I thought you would answer with, yes, that does have credability with me.
I built my 95R into a full Griggs car and drove it for a little over a year that way till it started breaking. I converted it to all MM and have driven it for two years since. I also bought my Griggs race car(94) partly thru this last race season and I honestly can not say that the Griggs handles better, thus my confusion with some of your comments earlier.
When you talk about the "immersed" or "subterranean" roll center of the MM setup, your going to have to explain that better. Are you referring to the front suspension setup, a 3 link, or what? I will agree that the roll centers are lower on the MM than the griggs, but if you are literally implying that MM's roll center is below ground level on a static car, that is not true.
Brian
I built my 95R into a full Griggs car and drove it for a little over a year that way till it started breaking. I converted it to all MM and have driven it for two years since. I also bought my Griggs race car(94) partly thru this last race season and I honestly can not say that the Griggs handles better, thus my confusion with some of your comments earlier.
When you talk about the "immersed" or "subterranean" roll center of the MM setup, your going to have to explain that better. Are you referring to the front suspension setup, a 3 link, or what? I will agree that the roll centers are lower on the MM than the griggs, but if you are literally implying that MM's roll center is below ground level on a static car, that is not true.
Brian
Last edited: