Bank rate survey finds: 56% of Americans cannot cover a $1000 emergency

IA Shelby

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
3,597
Location
Iowa
Just saw this article on CNBC. 56% cannot cover a $1000 emergency expense without using a credit card or borrowing from friends or family.

So much for Bidenomics.

It also speaks to the fact that many still prioritize the wrong things. I wonder how many of the 56% are daily Starbuck’s client, etc…
 

Blackoyote

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
2,034
Location
Matthews, NC
A few years ago I remember a study from one of the large institutions that said 64% of households couldn't cover a $400 emergency bill...so honestly hearing this new study isn't a shock and honestly surprised it's not worse than that.

So many people are just bad at saving money...
 

MDShelby

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2012
Messages
3,792
Location
Maryland
While I don't doubt the financial illiteracy of the USA as a whole, I always wonder about the data. It's easy to skew things for the 'sky is falling' big-media hype.
That is exactly where I was going. What spending $1000 means to one person isn't the same to another.
 

jrandy

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Messages
1,954
Location
Bay Area
That is exactly where I was going. What spending $1000 means to one person isn't the same to another.

Yup... just like the one that comes out every few months about XX% of people don't save any money. But the article conveniently buries the fact that they are fully funding 401k, IRA, and 529's.

Again, I don't doubt a bunch of people in this country couldn't legitimately pull a few thousand in cash out of the bank for a true emergency. But, the doom and gloom is where the media lives.
 

13COBRA

Resident Ford Dealer
Established Member
Premium Member
Single Barrel Sirs
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
22,505
Location
Missouri
Yup... just like the one that comes out every few months about XX% of people don't save any money. But the article conveniently buries the fact that they are fully funding 401k, IRA, and 529's.

Again, I don't doubt a bunch of people in this country couldn't legitimately pull a few thousand in cash out of the bank for a true emergency. But, the doom and gloom is where the media lives.

No one reads/clicks if it's just the status quo of the world spinning around.
 

IA Shelby

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
3,597
Location
Iowa
Yup... just like the one that comes out every few months about XX% of people don't save any money. But the article conveniently buries the fact that they are fully funding 401k, IRA, and 529's.

Again, I don't doubt a bunch of people in this country couldn't legitimately pull a few thousand in cash out of the bank for a true emergency. But, the doom and gloom is where the media lives.
I highly doubt anybody who doesn’t have a $1000 in savings is fully funding a 401k.

The % of employees fully funding a 401k is single digits.
 

black92

Hot rod Lincoln
Established Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
6,705
Location
Olathe, KS
My old boss always told me, "It's not about how much money you make, but how you spend your money." Now clearly, we all have to make above a certain threshold to be able to save and whatnot, but the point stands.
 

GTSpartan

Yield right!!!!
Established Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
9,351
Location
The Woods
Why Women Kill Money GIF by Paramount+
 

kaz109

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
6,203
Location
Cali
Just saw this article on CNBC. 56% cannot cover a $1000 emergency expense without using a credit card or borrowing from friends or family.

So much for Bidenomics.

It also speaks to the fact that many still prioritize the wrong things. I wonder how many of the 56% are daily Starbuck’s client, etc…
Lol@ thinking this is new because of the current administration. People’s priorities have always been out of order and that won’t change.

Also thinking that article at face value is naive
 

4.698gt

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
339
Location
NJ

I highly doubt anybody who doesn’t have a $1000 in savings is fully funding a 401k.

The % of employees fully funding a 401k is single digits.
There are definitely people out there not saving in any aspect, there are people who are saving in liquidity(savings account) vs not saving in long term savings(401k, retirement ect). Then there are some, myself included, who save a small amount into my savings account(3%) a larger amount into long term investments(401k and stocks 20%ish) and the rest heads into checking to take care of all the bills.
It might not be the wisest financial decisions but for my life at the moment it's working. I unlike many of people my age(37) and younger, I do understand compound interest and it's effect over 30 years, I understand (to an extent) market swings and the need to invest during the downturns(covid, housing crash ect) and with a little luck I've amassed a comfortable mix of savings.
In all honesty though, I'd had none of it had I never asked my grandfather about my 401k when I first received the packet for any of it.
 

q6543

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
1,992
Location
midwest
Unfortunately, live for today and the YOLO mentality has only gotten worse.

I feel guilty spending money these days, it’s the other side of the problem. I can’t stand seeing my “number” go down.
 

Stanley

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Messages
5,078
Location
Deer Park, Texas, United States
I'm getting three bonuses pretty close together from work over the next month or so. My wife has it spent on major projects like redoing the pool and stuff, but I'm thinking rental property. If we both thought like she does we'd be bankrupt.
If I was single with no kids I'd be wealthy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top