are you happy with it? yes? no? on-the-fence?

[Mr.Bolt-on]

2005 is calling they want their joke back!
assclown I want a muscle car not some wiggered out ride that looks so gay!

Just buy a 1969 fastback. That's what I plan on doing since it's my dream car. Let ford design whatever they want. You can build any classic mustang you want for around the same price as a new mustang anyways, and that's with updated suspension, interior, engine and wheels on the classic.

 

[SIRLOIN]

I'm serioulsy confused how any Mustang fan/owner could not think this is without a doubt the hottest Mustang EVER?!

Thank you Ford for making such a bad-ass car!!!

 

[CobraRed01]

I'm serioulsy confused how any Mustang fan/owner could not think this is without a doubt the hottest Mustang EVER?!

Thank you Ford for making such a bad-ass car!!!

Well...if you put it that way.

Point taken. Not that I needed to be convinced or anything. Nice photo comparison. Very convincing.

 

[SIRLOIN]

I can't wait to see what the aftermarket is going to have in store for this thing. FINALLY a Mustang that you can have an endless world of wheel possibilities...

So badass!!!!

 

[70GT6]

Dont like the Tiburon looking rear quarters and the Nissan GTR accents in the grill.
SOOOO glad I got the '13 GT500, I thought about waiting to see what the '15 would bring.

 

[jes_csx]

I am amazed with how hung up some people are on certain aesthetic features when its almost certain to be a huge improvement in so many ways... the most important being the driving experience.
Take the C7 as an example. I can't stand the rear end. Radii are too tight, its too angular, the pipes look stupid all together etc. I still like the rest of the car though... and I'm sure after driving one my rear-end hangups would start to fade pretty quick.
Subjective styling opinions aside, the new car is going to be so much better in almost every way... especially when we get to the SE's and SVT versions.

 

[skulls]

I'm serioulsy confused how any Mustang fan/owner could not think this is without a doubt the hottest Mustang EVER?!

Thank you Ford for making such a bad-ass car!!!

Cause its not...and those are some of the worst photos of the non '15 mustangs ive ever seen and some of the best of the '15....you sir, shouod be in politics.

 

[MRSUPRA]

It's not great looking or that bad. I just wish they would have made the front end/hood line lower and shorten the rear overhang. Seems kind of dumn trying to look modern while having a rear bumber that sticks out like it's from the 80's. Hopefully there will be some aftermarket add-ons like a GT500 type wing, and maybe something to add to the front end to make it look more aggressive.

 

[SIRLOIN]

Cause its not...and those are some of the worst photos of the non '15 mustangs ive ever seen and some of the best of the '15....you sir, shouod be in politics.

Okay...How about you post up some comparison pictures of both the stock Mustangs. Let me tell you, there aren't any flattering pics of stock Mustangs pre 2015, but would love to see you take a crack at it.

Patiently waiting.

 

[CobraRed01]

Cause its not...and those are some of the worst photos of the non '15 mustangs ive ever seen and some of the best of the '15....you sir, shouod be in politics.

Actually...those photos pretty much show how board-flat the S197 has been right up to the current model. The pinched waist, the wider haunches, the crisper front fascia and redesigned tail on '15 are all major improvements. The photos don't lie in this case and comparison on the street will only confirm the improvement.

 

[skulls]

Okay...How about you post up some comparison pictures of both the stock Mustangs. Let me tell you, there aren't any flattering pics of stock Mustangs pre 2015, but would love to see you take a crack at it.

Patiently waiting.

I dont care too...im not trying to convince the world of my point...your photos are off cars that have terrible composition, unflattering angles, harsh light and no post work for pre '15, the ones of the '15 have heavy post, super flattering light, great composition and nice angles...that is because they are professionally done...I can show you a victoria secert modrl on a shoot and then every day life going to get coffee and trust me, it's wildly different and obviously favors the shoot.

But hey, keep trying to justify why you like it...

i rest my case....

 

[01bluesnake]

The only thing worrying me about the '15, is kind of how Ford got out the '10 with the old powertrain and became an odd ball bastard child. You got the looks of the 11+ 5.0's, but the speed of the retired -'09 3V's. I'm hoping ford doesn't release the direct injection and lots better options come '16 otherwise the '15 will also become the odd one out. As far as how the '15 looks, i really like it. Some body configurations all single color keyed look blah, while the broken up two tone really look good. The front is still working on me, but with different splitters and packages im sure they will look fine.

 

[CobraRed01]

I dont care too...im not trying to convince the world of my point...your photos are off cars that have terrible composition, unflattering angles, harsh light and no post work for pre '15, the ones of the '15 have heavy post, super flattering light, great composition and nice angles...that is because they are professionally done...I can show you a victoria secert modrl on a shoot and then every day life going to get coffee and trust me, it's wildly different and obviously favors the shoot.

But hey, keep trying to justify why you like it...

i rest my case....

Wow...S197 Mustangs with lipstick, mascara and major tata's. I can see how that would make them look much better.

 

[skulls]

Wow...S197 Mustangs with lipstick, mascara and major tata's. I can see how that would make them look much better.

I can see, you only want to read into what you want to and have fully missed the point...

 

[SIRLOIN]

I think it's hilarious that he actually took the time to post up a bunch of pictures of some chics to prove his point, instead of posting pictures of S197 Mustang's.

Go ahead...Post up the worst actual pictures you can find of the S550, next to the best "professionally done" actual stock S197's...op:

I don't need to justify what I like or what I think is better looking, or feel the need to try and convince anyone which one looks like an outdated turd compared to the other. The poll above and the pictures speak for themselves.

 

[htk084]

S197 starting to look straight up ANCIENT

 

[skulls]

I actually think it's hilarious that he actually took the time to post up a bunch of pictures of some chics to prove his point, instead of posting pictures of S197 Mustang's.

Go ahead...Post up the worst actual pictures you can find of the S550, next to the best "professionally done" actual stock S197's...op:

I don't need to justify what I like or what I think is better looking, or feel the need to try and convince anyone which one looks like an outdated turd compared to the other. The poll above speaks for itself.

Yet, you posted photos showing why you think its better...might want to rethink your statement..
The poll proves people like it, that's all...not that people think it looks WAY better and the best mustang Ford has ever put out, yet apparently you think that's what it shows..enjoy living in your delusional world....lmao.


And again you've fully over looked my point with the photos...but ill you get back to your fantasy world.

 

[SIRLOIN]

Yet, you posted photos showing why you think its better...might want to rethink your statement..
The poll proves people like it, that's all...not that people think it looks WAY better and the best mustang Ford has ever put out, yet apparently you think that's what it shows..enjoy living in your delusional world....lmao.

All I did was post pictures for comparison's sake. I don't see how that's "trying to convince the world of my point" as you say. If that's the case I would have posted the pictures and then added my 02. on why one looks better than the other. I posted the pictures to let everyone decide on their own. Posting the pictures of the S197 seem's to have really struck a cord with you for some reason lmao...

As for the poll, your right...it proves people like it. In fact, it show's that quite decisively. There was no option to click for the "WAY better and the best Mustang Ford has ever put out", so how the hell do you know what the people voting in favor of it really think about it?

And again you've fully over looked my point with the photos...but ill you get back to your fantasy world.

I think the only person delusional here is you. I don't see how I over looked the point of your chick pictures AGAIN...:??: You were talking to someone else the first time...Lmao....:shrug:

 

[Neos281]

The Effects of Pedestrian Standards

It's not great looking or that bad. I just wish they would have made the front end/hood line lower and shorten the rear overhang. Seems kind of dumn trying to look modern while having a rear bumber that sticks out like it's from the 80's. Hopefully there will be some aftermarket add-ons like a GT500 type wing, and maybe something to add to the front end to make it look more aggressive.

I believe what you are seeing is Ford's initiative to make this Mustang a "Global" vehicle. European/Asian Pedestrian Standards are controlling the design of the car. You can see this across the entire MB range (minus the soon-to-be updated C-Class).

Here is a short excerpt from C&D.

Think modern cars look bloated? Of course you do. Part of what you're seeing is the effect of European and Asian pedestrian-protection requirements that went live last decade. The idea is to leave enough space beneath the hood to keep a struck pedestrian's head from caving it in far enough to hit the top of the engine. So, you'd expect higher hoods and taller noses. But that little bit of air over the intake manifold ripples through and changes everything.

 

[skulls]

I believe what you are seeing is Ford's initiative to make this Mustang a "Global" vehicle. European/Asian Pedestrian Standards are controlling the design of the car. You can see this across the entire MB range (minus the soon-to-be updated C-Class).

Here is a short excerpt from C&D.

That's actually, very, very interesting.