wnt2gofst
Banned
Stock injectors are not going to cut it for E85.
Without the boss intake no real reason to take about 7100-7200. Even with ported intake
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
AED's dyno tuned BOSS IM Results/Review
- Thread starter FIFTY
- Start date
Stock injectors are not going to cut it for E85.
Without the boss intake no real reason to take about 7100-7200. Even with ported intake
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
I guess I should have been more clear. I was trying to find out the max RPM on the stock coyote valve train when swapping a Boss intake on it (when does valve float occur with the stock springs).
wrong, 04sleeper is doing just fine on stock injectors
its no different then stock, your on borrowed time when you start raising that rev limiter
My thought exactly. I am curious to know if springs can be replaced with the heads still on the engine and in the car. I suppose with all the work involved in getting the cams out of the way, it's probably best to just pull the heads to get the springs replaced.
Same concern stands for the oil pump (expended high RPM durability).
back to the OP-
I am very impressed with these numbers, and Shaun WILL be doing my tune once I'm prepared to go that direction.
Vicious jay, upgraded injectors are highly recommended if your tuner is going to take full advantage of what e85 has to offer. Also, 7500 and below is t necessarily on borrowed time...spinning past those Rs' then yes I would agree.
wnt2gofst
Banned
With full bolt ons its not going to.cut it. You will be maxing them out. Why you think they are switching to 47's. You need on average of 40% more fuel. Stocks are not going to cut it less you run them over duty cycle. If just tune, and E85 and like cold air. Not pushing Max power like doing in this thread with full bolt ons.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Shaun wouldn't even TOUCH my car without injectors!!!
wnt2gofst
Banned
Heard Lund wouldn't touch another car with out injectors either. HMM two tuners thinking same thing say it isn't so. :shrug:
I would sure like to see the before and after comparisons overlay-ed.
All N/A Coyote dyno results I've seen have the same 2 humps in the middle of the powerband regardless of which intake manifold is used.
2011 Mustang GT Dyno Data Summary
Those seem to be strangely missing as well....
Just for comparisons sake, here is my M6 car on a Dynocom dyno with no other changes made vs. the Dynojet:
As with wnt2gofst, there seems to be some resolution lost in the Dynocom graphs. The humps in the middle are there, just not as pronounced.
I mentioned that to Shaun when he was tuning my car and he was able to eliminate 90% of it.
Is that the tuning you had done that netted a total of 7HP gain?
http://www.svtperformance.com/forum...stalled-464-whp-8200-rpms-3.html#post12156587
Do you have the before and after graphs?
Correct. My car is 100% stock right down to the air filter. It was JUST enough when I tuned it.
wnt2gofst
Banned
i just did a boss manifold, accufab TB, and steeda boss intake on my car. dyno results within the next few days
I would like to try it. However, I am not interested in replacing my clutch and upgrading the driveline so it can survive launching at 6k. I also don't want to spin my stock motor to 7600 rpm to take advantage of the intake. So, I am going to soldier on with the stocker for now.
I really wish the aftermarket would step up and give us something in between the stocker and the Boss.
Mike
Users who are viewing this thread
