Ok your 1
Ok your 1
:-D:-D:-D
do you have some info on this? all i've heard as of late is that ford USA and ford oz were fighting over rights to design the global RWD platform that would underpin both cars, and it ended up getting axed when the new US CAFE regs were released. from what i understand, the mustang will return on a major revision of the current S197 architecture(no doubt, with an IRS).
We'd rather have the best solid axle than a mediocre multi-point rear. Hint, hint, Chevy. 'Nuff said.
The 2014 Mustang, which will be based off a revised Falcon platform, shouldn't add more weight.
Hi mate, how you been?do you have some info on this? all i've heard as of late is that ford USA and ford oz were fighting over rights to design the global RWD platform that would underpin both cars, and it ended up getting axed when the new US CAFE regs were released. from what i understand, the mustang will return on a major revision of the current S197 architecture(no doubt, with an IRS).
either way, i'm positive that the mustang will weigh the same, if not lose weight, since ford has been focusing on cutting weight on all new cars to help with the CAFE regs.
wescoent said:"The only thing the Mustang and Falcon will share are powertrains, most of the stuff fore of the firewall, and the usual Ford interior bits.
Thunderbird is in discussions as a US-built, Falcon-derived sports sedan to hit back at the Charger. Falcon would remain as an Australian-built unit. Regardless, the Thunderbird would be significantly more stylish... think Mercedes CLS.
MKR would follow suit to give Auto Alliance more work to do, and to compliment the Lincoln line."
(emphasis added)
Thunderbird as a sports-sedan indicates that Taurus will stay FWD/AWD. Interesting that the MKR would be built at Auto Alliance...
================================================== ======
Why does 'global' to everyone mean Western Europe?
Lincoln going global means China, Russia, the Middle East, Africa, and South America.
In the long run, Lincoln is looking to compete with Mercedes and BMW, in a manner of speaking. Attention to detail. Near-perfect reliability. Unmistakable styling. Unmatched customer service experience. Cutting-edge technology. It's not hyperbole... it's a goal.
Lincoln is slowly, but surely, creating their brand identity, and with each passing generation, the cars will improve.
They won't give up on the traditional American hallmarks of roominess for people and cargo, and effortless acceleration, which is why Western Europe will never accept them.
They're not there yet... not by a long shot, but that's the plan.
wescoent said:In all honesty, nothing is really truly set in concrete yet, except for the general idea to leverage Ford of Australia's RWD engineering on a global scale. Lots of really good ideas on the table. Mustang and Falcon will share parts and some engineering, and Lincoln and Thunderbird will probably end up in the picture.
In my head, based on what I've heard as being on the table, combined with my own opinion, here's my take:
-There should be two versions of this new GRWD platform... one for sedans, one for coupes. The Mustang needs a unique rear-end and floorpan to accommodate the fastback. Regarding coupes, they should expand to include a Lincoln coupe and a Falcon coupe. Similar underpinnings, but the Lincoln built in Michigan, and the Falcon built in Australia, wearing Falcon-esque skin.
-Regarding sedans... there should be two general bodyshells. A more upright, formal bodyshell, and a swoopier 4-door coupe bodyshell. Sell the upright one as the next-generation MKS and Falcon (and a cheapo version as a police interceptor), and the swoopier one as a Thunderbird and a smaller Lincoln companion, MKR. The swoopier one can share some parts with the Mustang, even.
-Regarding large sedans... import the Taurus to Australia to sell as the Fairlane.
Ultimately, we end up with two factories building this platform, with two versions (coupe, upright sedan), along with a tweener 4-door coupe.
I think it could work, and we may end up seeing a final plan fairly close to that.
not too bad, just wasting life away and your self?Hi mate, how you been?
Here's a comprehensive view of what is on the drawing board. As he says, it's the plan, but they're still a fair way off at this stage.
We'd rather have the best solid axle than a mediocre multi-point rear. Hint, hint, Chevy. 'Nuff said.
The 2014 Mustang, which will be based off a revised Falcon platform, shouldn't add more weight.
I have had 2003 Cobra, 2008 Gt500 and 2010 GT500 all as daily drivers. The 08 was better than the 03 and 10 is better than both as a daily driver in ride and comfort. About the axel thing Motor Trend did not complain about it at all and matter of fact state the Handling was better than either the IRS equiped Camaro or Challenger in the handling dept. The 11 does not wheel hop anymore which is a plus nothing to buy when the 2011 ships. The 08 and 10 wheelhop was a very easy and cheap to fix, a Roush anti wheelhop kit did the trick which consisted of a UCA that cannot be said for the 03 IRS. I'am sure that my 2011 GT500 will be better than my 2010 they just keep getting better every year. I really do not miss my 03 Cobra and i will never have one again the new ones are just so much better.
assuming that ford makes the mistake GM made, building the car on a platform designed only with sedans in mind. fortunatly, ford isn't that stupid and they'll design the GRWD platform with both large sedans and medium sized coupes in mind. the IRS isn't the only thing that's heavier than it should be in the pig ass camaro.
exactly why im waiting to drive a 2011 gt. brand new car for 29k with 365whp and a nice upgraded interior. the 03/04 cobras are gonna have to drop 10 to 20% by the end of this year if the new GT is what they say it is.
If it's based off the current FG platform, itself on target for a diet, the net gain in weight for Mustang would be next to nothing.
The current I6 (cast iron I6 weighs the same as the new 5.0) Falcon is 3750lbs, and if they do what they say they want to do I can't it being a problem keeping the Mustang with IRS at the same ~3650lbs.
Now, that's not light as much as the Camaro is a porky. Camaro needs Alpha.
Does the Falcon meet US safety standards?
Obviously the new chassis would have to meet current and future standards, which often (not always) translates to more weight. It is going to be a tough battle to lose weight and maintain price, but I hope they are successful. Ford has been doing some creative things so far, so I want to believe its possible.
Why do you think the Mustang would be 100lbs. lighter than the Falcon or essentially weight the same as it does now?
From the IRS weights I have seen for the 03-04' Cobra and 10' Camaro, you are essentially saying the new platform would save 150-200lbs. (the weight of IRS over a SRA). Although it does look like the Falcon is longer than the Mustang and lets hope it stays that way as the Mustang doesn't need to get any bigger. Perhaps the Mustang is going to get smaller.......