The kid posted up that anticipated dyno session video which took place in Dallas TX area, elevation friendly vs Las Vegas. Must say the car could be for sure under rated and more in line with that earlier FP techs statement of 850HP.
I am curious as well to know the actual % loss through that dct is. Wonder if it is similar to any other dct out there.I wonder how much driveline loss with the DCT?
Such a bad ass car. That thing really moves out in DRAG mode. I've never tried the DRAG mode in my car yet. The SPORT+ mode is vicious though.
" STD " corrections, SAE J607, used by some shops because it produces higher #'s.
.
"......STD, or standard correction, represents one of the oldest correction factors used by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). STD is also known as J607 and it uses standard conditions of 60-degrees F, 29.92inHg and 0-percent humidity.
.
Ford & other Mfg. use SAE J1349 corrections when advertising hp & tq. #'s.
Also, what gear was the car in to produce the " desired " 1 to 1 " drive ratio ??
Um, yes? Why would that ever change lolPeople still pay attention to dyno numbers in 2019?
Are you trying to antagonize in every thread about this car?Because Dyno numbers won’t accurately represent a car’s performance out on the real world. Dyno numbers are easily manipulated and are used to trick sheeple into believing the author’s narrative. Even when not manipulated results will vary without changes.
He just strongly believes in his opinion, which is (I think) gt500 performance + aesthetics != cost of buying oneAre you trying to antagonize in every thread about this car?
I’ve known him long enough to know that he likes to rustle jimmies.He just strongly believes in his opinion, which is (I think) gt500 performance + aesthetics != cost of buying one
I'll never be able to afford one so whatever either way
Sent from my SM-N975U using the svtperformance.com mobile app