CobraBob said:You're pushing more weight (about 250 lbs.) so you'll need about 480-490 to the rear wheels IMO. And a good launch.
96-02 are the previous style Viper GTS's. The 2003 Viper would be a SRT-10.URDONE said:Probably like an 02 or 03. I am not sure, I know he ain't getting a new one though.
vipergts281 said:A roll race between a pullied Cobra and a GTS should be a close race IMO. Torque will be about the same for both cars. Cobra will probably have a little more rwhp. But the Viper is about 200 lbs. lighter.
vipergts281 said:96-02 are the previous style Viper GTS's. The 2003 Viper would be a SRT-10.
The GTS just came back out....called a SRT Coupe. They are expensive though, sticker on one is close to $90,000.URDONE said:So no more GTS? What exactly is the difference between GTS and SRT-10? Don't they put down the same HP?
About a month ago. I have to call him though, he called about two weeks ago, I've just been very busy and keep forgetting to get back to him.Mike K said:Speaking of Vipers, have you talked to Sal (sp) lately?
You definitely need a bit more power to offset the weight. Not sure of the exact amount though.URDONE said:So I would need about 40-50 rwhp to offset the weight?
Yeah, they are extremely tight in the c**kpit. I sat in a 03 and it wasn't the most comfortable thing. All Vipers are like that though.rmgtc01 said:Subscribing.
My buddy just got an 03 Viper. It is stock, and it is his first sports car. He has only had it for a couple of months. It's tight in the ****pit, but very ergonomic feeling.
He got it because he liked the speed of my car, but now he thinks it is the fastest thing on the road.
I know I can out drive him, but not sure how I will do against that V-10.
Magazines stats:
0-60 mph in: 3.9
1/4: 12.1 seconds at 121 mph
So I would like to know some real life highway stories as well before I go talking smack.