Good deal. And yes subd for results with boss mainfold and this. What's the next step up in spring over the 9.7?
Good deal. And yes subd for results with boss mainfold and this. What's the next step up in spring over the 9.7?
about 11.5, but imo that is too much for a stock car, at least that we would ever install
Great offering here! Like others have said, this concept isn't necessarily new but offering it as a bolt on kit sure is!
Curious though, so how does both power and peak torque go up from this? Obviously torque would come on earlier, but I guess if you cap it at the same peak boost it seems like you would have the same peak torque, just a quicker ramp up?
Great offering here! Like others have said, this concept isn't necessarily new but offering it as a bolt on kit sure is!
Curious though, so how does both power and peak torque go up from this? Obviously torque would come on earlier, but I guess if you cap it at the same peak boost it seems like you would have the same peak torque, just a quicker ramp up?
Good point. Still wrapping my head around the more power part, but makes sense why torque is not only earlier but higher.the smaller increases load on the car, that's why it makes more power / torque
Yeah I get that for the most part, I just would have expected power to remain more or less the same..but it makes sense if torque increases that that multiplies out to an increased hp number.Not necessarily because just like a TVS seeing boost earlier especially in towards peak TQ of the engine will make more TQ like TVS do. With beefs setup he hits peek boost of his dyno charts 5900-6000 vs before at 7100 so at 4400 rpm natural peak TQ curve it is also seeing 6-7lbs vs 4lbs without pulley. HP should stay they same or little less in beefs setup do to 9.7 vs 9.8 lbs of boost plus the charge air will be hotter since the blower is really making 15lbs and bleeding the rest of via wastegate.
Not necessarily because just like a TVS seeing boost earlier especially in towards peak TQ of the engine will make more TQ like TVS do. With beefs setup he hits peek boost of his dyno charts 5900-6000 vs before at 7100 so at 4400 rpm natural peak TQ curve it is also seeing 6-7lbs vs 4lbs without pulley. HP should stay they same or little less in beefs setup do to 9.7 vs 9.8 lbs of boost plus the charge air will be hotter since the blower is really making 15lbs and bleeding the rest of via wastegate.
Not necessarily because just like a TVS seeing boost earlier especially in towards peak TQ of the engine will make more TQ like TVS do. With beefs setup he hits peek boost of his dyno charts 5900-6000 vs before at 7100 so at 4400 rpm natural peak TQ curve it is also seeing 6-7lbs vs 4lbs without pulley. HP should stay they same or little less in beefs setup do to 9.7 vs 9.8 lbs of boost plus the charge air will be hotter since the blower is really making 15lbs and bleeding the rest of via wastegate.
Good point. Still wrapping my head around the more power part, but makes sense why torque is not only earlier but higher.
Yeah I get that for the most part, I just would have expected power to remain more or less the same..but it makes sense if torque increases that that multiplies out to an increased hp number.
Why isn't the boost curve that much different? It's a little higher but it still has the same shape, a slow ramp. Would a much smaller pulley make it more "PD"ish? Like a real small pulley with a 9# wastegate spring? Or would that create too much parasitic loss or heat?
Ok, can someone please explain to me like I am 5.
Why is the peak power higher on less boost with this setup?