I am so glad that there is finally a video out where the GT500 outruns the ZL1 on a road course other than in the 1/4 mile.
The zl1 looks better?
felt better?
they used a beat up car?
why did they not let a GM driver drive?
did they use the proper PTM mode?
the GT500 has 80 more HP?
they should run the cars for several laps instead of just one?
the GT500 costs way more and needs the added packages to keep up?
they should test a base GT500 because thats more apples to apples?
why didnt they use a shorter course with cones?
because walmart?
I could go on but whatever.....:lol1:
I will say this: the zl1 is a nice car, the best thing it has going for it is this: its the most aggressive and best looking 5th gen you can get and the suspension is amazing, I mean that seriously. Other than that, would not own one....
The GT500 uses an archaic suspension setup and is very raw, yet it manages to keep up and often BEAT the zl1 where it is supposed to dominate...and this is what we were waiting for, same driver, same day, same conditions....no excuses
great time to be a pony car fan...im glad I have mine! :beer:
"but my car has more technology"
"but my seats are heated"
"but my car costs less!"
"there was something wrong with that zl1"
"but the zl1 looks better"
"it was fixed"
Did I cover them all? Lol
Can someone please post this under the pics and vids section? More traffic and some butthurt will ensue
Sent with my Massive Johnson
This was just posted in their thread talking about this:
"These results for the GT500 and ZL1 were previously released by Motor Trend in June (http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...0/viewall.html). The GT500 had the faster first lap, but, due to brake fade in the GT500, the ZL1 had the faster last lap, and the ZL1's lap times were very consistent with all of them being within 0.2 seconds. The Motor Trend comparison concluded that the ZL1 was the better vehicle."
Ha ha. Goldenbear needs to embrace his butthurt. He really can't deal with the reality that he has the much slower but marginally more comfortable car. LMAO
If the ZL1 can't take a C63 Black at Laguna Seca then it certainly won't destroy it at Nurburgring.
2010 AMG C63 laps Nurburgring at 8:13 with driver Horst Von Saurma (King of the Ring)
A year later the ZL1 laps the Ring in 7:41 with Aaron Link driving?
I am sorry but I can't see taking a car by over 33 seconds at one track then losing all of that advantage an LOSING at another.
Different driver? Horst wins all day over Link
Different day? Horst Von Saurma doesn't care about days or weather, he has almost EVERY stock record at the Ring.
Nice to see the measures taken by Chevrolet to decieve the public.
Checkmate....
Great results. Both have proven to be exceptional cars, and I would truly enjoy swapping keys with a ZL1 owner for an opportunity to compare vehicles. Each are a tremendous value and offer their respective camps something to be proud of. However, at the end of the day, the GT500 is simply the faster vehicle. Period.
The GT500 has won ALL quarter mile/acceleration tests and has a few road course victories.
The ZL1 has lost ALL quarter mile/acceleration tests and has a few road course victories.
These findings simply prove that, stock for stock, it's clearly a driver's race at the track. But in daily driving situations, and at the drags, the GT500 will show the ZL1 its tail-lights. Every time.
So, I'm confused, what is there still left to talk about on C5? Why can't respect just be given where it is due? I will gladly park next to a ZL1 at the next car show and talk shop for a few hours! But boy will I look forward to both of us pulling out together at the end of the night even more!! :bash:
so the mustang GT lost at the track in a track test, where's the bias? and don't bring cost into this unless you want to start talking about materials and quality. i don't see anything wrong with the results of that comparison, it was a track test, not a "pointless objective metric" test.Just to show you how bias, and full of shit these magazines tend to be watch this video. The Mustang GT with the Brembo package beat the M3 in every performance test except it was less than a tenth of a second slower around Willow Springs. Still even though the driver Randy Pobst said it was a huge win for the Mustang at $25K less than the M3 MT says they see it different as a win is a win regardless of margin and cost.
See video(it's a fun test to watch):
Super Coupes Track Attack! - 2011 Ford Mustang GT vs 2011 BMW M3 Coupe - YouTube
Done deal!! ZL1 lost at a road course.......want better brakes change the pads on the 2013 Shelby !!!!!:beer:
so the mustang GT lost at the track in a track test, where's the bias? and don't bring cost into this unless you want to start talking about materials and quality. i don't see anything wrong with the results of that comparison, it was a track test, not a "pointless objective metric" test.
(honestly, no one cares about the figure out or lateral Gs)
as far as the GT500 vs ZL1, that was a car comparison, not just a track test. like i've said before, i don't doubt for a second that there's some ****ery going on with these comparisons, but the logic behind them is sound(that the better car is the one that does the best in ALL arenas, not just on a track).