[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHXWsBQXbac"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHXWsBQXbac[/ame]
Rear camera view of the same race http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPGF7MUSq0c
Tim drives his car consistently to within 1% of its capabilities and I doubt that anybody (except possibly Hiro) could extract any more from it in a Sprint race. His personal capabilities may tend to carry the car higher in a race group then it should be. I am not knocking the car at all, it is a fantastic piece of kit, but in reality it has no place being ahead of a well driven, lighter and higher power purpose built tube chassis car.
I don't know how many of you have driven Pacific Raceways but the track has a lot of fairly technical transitions with lots of grade and asphalt changes. Tim's Cobra is a wonderfully developed racecar but mid to high speed finesse transitionals are not its forte. The long sweeper coming on to the pit straight (if I recall correctly) is very coarse asphalt, basically a tire grinding machine. I think that is why the car uses up its tires faster than his tube chassis competition when it is being driven to the max. In my mind I think of the car as more of a fist in a velvet glove. Get through the corner smoothly and balanced, pull the trigger and unleash the thunder (wow, thats almost like an ad copy writer would put it!!!).
The tube chassis car is designed with a lot better C.O.G.'s (even though it is an offset chassis) and its substantially lighter weight, flat downforce creating body and more power means that it is a lot gentler on the tires so they stay more effective longer. As well the tube chassis is probably stiffer than the Cobra R shell so the tires work closer to design plan.
I love the great video.
Eric
Now with the video and datalogging, you drivers can't "exagerate" on what happens where we can't see. :burn: