Then you view it as an appreciating asset to hold and that was not what it was designed for. To be fair many things are used for other than designed purpose, but BTC has value ONLY because someone wants it more than someone else. That's it, there is no other use to fall back on to, there is ZERO barrier to entry for any other competitive use for BTC, and therefore NO reason for a company to spend big bucks on something it can develop for itself. And with 10,000+ and growing crypto's, that is definitely what companies are doing.
So what does that mean? If I owned BTC, I would have a hair trigger sell button tuned to what the players were doing. Unfortunately, the freaking AI's move so fast, I think it will be brutal. But, plenty of stimulus to fuel the party for at least the next 2 years, so I hope you make a boatload of money.
I disagree with this short-term view and encourage you to research Bitcoin some more. I think then you would see why the term "Shitcoin" applies to the "10,000+ and growing" alternatives to Bitcoin.
A US-based CBDC is not "a crypto" and can never be what Bitcoin is (both in function and properties)...and I believe it will only further fuel the mass adoption for BTC.