'Uhhh....so why does that screenshot say 328 lb-ft? And if it really is 400, I have to assume the number shown for the 3.5 is wrong as well.
'
I would guess he is talking crank numbers, the video shows rwhp/rwtq. and 400-18% makes that about right.
You didnt read my response or watch the dyno video. The screenshot is of the 2015 2.7. The 2018 is vastly different.Uhhh....so why does that screenshot say 328 lb-ft? And if it really is 400, I have to assume the number shown for the 3.5 is wrong as well.
No, the 2018 makes 400 ft lbs at the tire per the dyno. The screen shot is from a 2015 2.7. Not the same output by any means which was my whole point. The op was making a point but the reality is the comparison should include the real nunbers from all engines offered today 2018.'
I would guess he is talking crank numbers, the video shows rwhp/rwtq. and 400-18% makes that about right.
Please take a look at each engine from 2018 and then make a choice. The 2018 eb engines are far superior to what they were in 2015. Doesnt seem realistic but it is. I lolike the 5.0 from a simplicity sake compared to the eb, but you just cannot beat the power per ci ratio of these 2018 engines. The 2.7 also uses the same block design technology as a diesel. Stupid strong.Explains why i liked the 5.0L over the the 3.5 eco. Good video
Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com
My little 165 cubic inch 2.7 just hit 3500 miles and I swear the program in the computer must have something do with it. Holy crap, does this thing run harder than with 1K on it. This truck will roll the hell out. Transmission is way smoother too.
I’m very impressed so far. 24 MPG in town hand calculated, truck says 24.7. I actually have to use the cruise control in the neighborhood. It really moves that easily.Yes, ford really has something here. I wish they could bottle this magic up in a larger displacement engine. It would be record breaking. The 10 speed is ridiculous. Mine just hit 10k and the 10 speed just gets better, just wait you'll see.
Yes. I drive 50 miles each day to work. Set cruise to 65, and use premium. It only costs 45 dollars per week and that uncludes the weekend run to hd.I’m very impressed so far. 24 MPG in town hand calculated, truck says 24.7. I actually have to use the cruise control in the neighborhood. It really moves that easily.
Please take a look at each engine from 2018 and then make a choice. The 2018 eb engines are far superior to what they were in 2015. Doesnt seem realistic but it is. I lolike the 5.0 from a simplicity sake compared to the eb, but you just cannot beat the power per ci ratio of these 2018 engines. The 2.7 also uses the same block design technology as a diesel. Stupid strong.
Cause gen 1 2.7 is rated at 375tq at the motor. The 328tq to wheels would be on par. Since they did not dyno a gen 2 2.7 which is rated at 400tq to the motorUhhh....so why does that screenshot say 328 lb-ft? And if it really is 400, I have to assume the number shown for the 3.5 is wrong as well.
Personally i consider 75 more rwt to be quite superiorThe power bump and 10 speed helps. I wouldnt say far superior.
The 3.5 ecoboost being a 2015, makes full torque at 2500. Their dyno chart show full torque later on.
Personally i consider 75 more rwt to be quite superior
Could be a happy dyno. Seems extremely highThere is a v8deo i posted of a 2018 gen 2 and it did make 400 rwt at the wheels.
Lund is one of the better tuners in the industry. I trust his dyno.Could be a happy dyno. Seems extremely high
Lund is one of the better tuners in the industry. I trust his dyno.
Also, ford rates the 2018 2.7 at 400 ft lbs
2018 Winner: Ford F-150 2.7L EcoBoost Twin Turbo V-6
My little 165 cubic inch 2.7 just hit 3500 miles and I swear the program in the computer must have something do with it. Holy crap, does this thing run harder than with 1K on it. This truck will roll the hell out. Transmission is way smoother too.