I seriously disagree. There's no way spinning my whipple over is such a chore it's dogging my motor till 4000+ rpms. It's not like I'm spinning a giant dyno drum under the hood.
Listen to the experience son, you might learn something.
I seriously disagree. There's no way spinning my whipple over is such a chore it's dogging my motor till 4000+ rpms. It's not like I'm spinning a giant dyno drum under the hood.
I seriously disagree. There's no way spinning my whipple over is such a chore it's dogging my motor till 4000+ rpms. It's not like I'm spinning a giant dyno drum under the hood.
Maybe if you actually threw some real gears in the car it would feel better lol.. The cars need atleast 3.73's
For those asking about why big blower and not spin it hard. I was going with the assumption/after reading here for a while, I could get the awesomeness of the eaton and still enjoy the efficiency of a bigger blower with the 2.9 ie low ait2s etc.
Listen to the experience son, you might learn something.
.
It takes more power plain and simple to spin a larger compressor.
Case in point. Top Fuel blowers take aprox 500HP to spin.....do you think it takes 500HP to spin your 2.3 whipple at the desired boost level? Your 2.3 definitely takes more than eaton ..........so whats to question here?
Never said I'm not listening. I said that theory is ridiculous... son.
Nobody doubts there is more parasitic drag on the motor from a larger blower. So yes it'll take more HP to spin it over. However your theory that turning over the larger blower (IE the whipple) is what's causing the car to be doggy in the lower RPMs is what I'm saying is wrong.
If that were true then adding a 4lb lower and a smaller upper pulley would just compound the problem because now your motor is forced to turn over the blower even harder in the lower RPMs and should dog it even more. However it does not. In fact quite the opposite happens, the motor really wakes up in the lower RPMS. Hummm how can this be possible? because by your theory the motor should be dogging even more now as it's just been over labored even more.
How about could it possibly be a twin screw is not as efficient in the lower RPMs as a roots blower? nahhh that would just make to much sense :bored:
hence the success of the TVS, great low end pwr like the eaton, and the high end like a twin screw...
Installed a Whipple 3.4l on my dads lightning. Same issue, didn't seem to pull as strong on the bottom as the ported eaton. He was on low boost w/the whipple and tuner told him the same thing...need to turn up the boost!!! The other issue I noticed was the Whipple seemed a lot heavier than the Eaton. Not sure of the difference in weight, but adding weight on the front of a Lightning or Cobra is never a good idea. Maybe Senkak or someone else can chime in on the weight difference.
Jay(Blown04SVT) replaced his 2.9 Crusher with a VMP TVS 2.3
I believe the TVS was ~40lbs lighter.
Need to check old threads to be exact.
hence the success of the TVS, great low end pwr like the eaton, and the high end like a twin screw...
^^^^^^
Is TVS a roots or TS or a hybrid of both?
This thread makes me chuckle. Snappier will not be there at 14 lbs no way no how. As broke and many have stated larger blowers need to be spun to take real adavantage of what they offer. Depending on the tuners timing choice in the lower range has an effect as well. But do your self a favor throw some man fuel in it and crank that boost up. Hate to see you lose to a little old eaton car lol!
ding ding!!! I have seen first hand over and over these past 9 years a low boosted twinscrew stay neck and neck with a upper lower ported eaton cobra.