Holy crap, any back story on what the cause was?
The photos tell the tale: At first the truck is merrily hauling a two-axle trailer loaded with water tanks. In the next image, the truck has pulled over and flames are flickering in the wheel well as thick black smoke starts to pour out of the engine compartment.
In the next frame it’s evident that the engineers testing the Ford had already wisely abandoned the truck.
Our spy photographers report that from the time the first flames were visible in the wheel well to the entire front end being engulfed in flame took just three minutes. As the front of the truck continued to burn several explosions scattered parts of the Super Duty into the desert. Just 18 minutes later the truck was burned to the ground, with only charred puddles of aluminum and scorched roadway to tell the story.
Is it just me, or are you guys kind of starting to get the feeling that these manufacturers are moving to not only a less weight, more fuel efficient truck obviously that is their goal. But also, a more expendable truck to drive up new car sales and make the insurance claims possibly "easier"? To where they could just write the vehicle off as totaled, which in turn could result in less hassle from all parties with repair BS, and increase market sales at the same time because you would HAVE to go buy a replacement vehicle. I mean clearly you can't bring back a fire-caused accident most of the time unless it's a small electrical fire, but I'm just talking about in general it seems they want these things to just be totaled no matter what happens to them so they can't be put back on the road. :shrug: I never thought I'd see the day where a full framed truck could BURN to the ground and leave hardly no evidence.