Go Mach! Mod for mod the Mach will always be faster.
but either way a 4v is a 4v:banana:
The Mach has more like a 2 - 4 tenth advantage over the Cobra, stock for stock.
A bit more real world power and torque and a bit more gear. The Mach will win the roll race as well, I've seen it happen.
No, not really.
+1111111111111111Cams, heads, compression, a casting revision to the intake...the 99/01s are definitely no slouches though. Hell, they have the better intake cams.
Sure...a good drvr for the cobra, and avg for the mach..same driver though..see Ben99gts answer.Question is, Which one is faster in the 1320?
If you ask me they will probably be know more than maybe a half a car apart going through the traps depending on the drivers
Mach...generallyAlright, So give the win to the Mach on the 1320.
Which car would win in a "roll racing" or "top end" contest?
+1The Mach has more like a 2 - 4 tenth advantage over the Cobra, stock for stock.
A bit more real world power and torque and a bit more gear. The Mach will win the roll race as well, I've seen it happen.
the difference is LITTERALY in teh driver, but on AVERAGE the Mach1 will win by about 0.15sec
MUCH to learn you have grasshopper. Too much mag. research, not enough real world. Stay away from taurus world. LOLNope...look at all the MM&FF testes it always under .2 difference. and I have seen stock 99-01 Cobras do 13.3 and Mach1's do 13.2 .
Its no where near .4 of a difference
Stock Machs have run 12.8-12.9s. It's a 2 tenth difference on the conservative end, 4 tenths on the liberal end with comparable drivers.
AFAIK, MM&FF never did a head-to-head Mach 1 - 99/01 Cobra drag test.
5.0 Mustang did: http://www.mustang50magazine.com/fe..._cobra_mach1_bullitt_comparison/photo_03.html
I just know what I see at the track, a crappy track at that. I see stock Machs running 13.4s or better relatively often, not so for the stock 99/01 Cobras at this track. There is more than a .12 difference same day, same strip, and same or comparable driver.
I don't know anymore. I just saw a vid on youtube where a 2001 GT w/ CAI, 70mm TB, Aftermarket Plenum, UDP's, x pipe with cats, single chamber mufflers, and 4.10 gears.
He beat the Mach 1 everytime. From a dig he beat him by a good three cars.
I don't know if the Mach is an auto or if it was stock but judging by those races it wouldn't have mattered to the GT
Alright, So give the win to the Mach on the 1320.
Which car would win in a "roll racing" or "top end" contest?
:beer:You do realize you can find a vid of just about anything on youtube, right?
A GT with those mods would be a decent matchup for a stock Mach 1, mainly due to the gears. It will still be down by a good 20 rwhp or so to a stock Mach 1.
Stock GTs lay down about 230 rwhp, full bolt on GTs will lay down about 260 rwhp, full bolt-on GTs with cams will lay down about 290 rwhp.
Stock Machs will lay down about 270 rwhp, full bolt on Machs will lay down about 330 rwhp, full bolt-on Machs with cams will lay down about 360 rwhp. At every stage the Mach has a much broader powerband paired with much higher peaks.
I've been down this route, the 2V can't begin to compare to the 4V when the playing field is even. Not even close.