Raced a new Type R in my RS(Video), AND a GSXR 1000 in my Cobra

gimmie11s

I Race Pontiacs
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
18,610
Location
la la land
Those type r's are going to be monsters once the aftermarket gets going. Watch out!

Honda heads flow ridiculously well.
 

svtfocus2cobra

Opprimere, Velocitas, Violentia Operandi
Established Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
26,471
Location
Washington
STD corrected I was 288/330 something.

I gained 50whp and 70wtq across the entire band from my tune

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
That is not even close to what Honda did here. They are actually advertising whp rather than the normal crank horsepower.

Sent from my SM-G935P using the svtperformance.com mobile app
 

Serpent

Bike or Cobra?
Established Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
9,350
Location
Mountain View, CA
How much of the type R's motor is strung out, I know its a smaller displacement motor compared to the RS. 2.0 vs 2.3

Curious to know which motor will max out first.
 

92GreenGT

Turbos FTW!!!
Established Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2004
Messages
1,184
Location
Big Stone Gap, VA
I'd take the RS over the Type R everyday of the week and twice on Sunday. Not to take anything away from Honda though, they've done wonders with their smaller engines. To me the RS is way more appealing, already forced induction, awd and can make tons more power cheaper. The Type R is a badass car, expensive for a FWD car but they handle like their on rails. I just see the RS as a better overall value.
 

Intervention302

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
2,994
Location
NH
I'd take the RS over the Type R everyday of the week and twice on Sunday. Not to take anything away from Honda though, they've done wonders with their smaller engines. To me the RS is way more appealing, already forced induction, awd and can make tons more power cheaper. The Type R is a badass car, expensive for a FWD car but they handle like their on rails. I just see the RS as a better overall value.
You realize the Type R is already boosted?

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 

Intervention302

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
2,994
Location
NH
No he doesn't, and also doesn't realize how much power the Type R can make cheap also...
Limit on the RS has been 425whp and 400wtq.

Not many have popped purely from power, but there are a small group of cars blowing head gaskets and cracking blocks both stock and tuned.

Bad casting on the head they say

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 

gimmie11s

I Race Pontiacs
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
18,610
Location
la la land
I'd take the RS over the Type R everyday of the week and twice on Sunday. Not to take anything away from Honda though, they've done wonders with their smaller engines. To me the RS is way more appealing, already forced induction, awd and can make tons more power cheaper. The Type R is a badass car, expensive for a FWD car but they handle like their on rails. I just see the RS as a better overall value.

This is a completely uninformed post.

Honda parts and upgrades are cheap as dirt. The Type R is already turbo. Honda motors of this generation are incredibly strong. The S2k will take 500whp all day long on completely stock hardware. I dont doubt this motor will prove to be equally as strong.

The head on this car will outflow the RS by a country mile.

The 2 major knocks against this car IMO are the way it looks LOL and the fact that its FWD.
 

Intervention302

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
2,994
Location
NH
This is a completely uninformed post.

Honda parts and upgrades are cheap as dirt. The Type R is already turbo. Honda motors of this generation are incredibly strong. The S2k will take 500whp all day long on completely stock hardware. I dont doubt this motor will prove to be equally as strong.

The head on this car will outflow the RS by a country mile.

The 2 major knocks against this car IMO are the way it looks LOL and the fact that its FWD.
Both negatives are end all's for me.

It's too ugly in my eyes.

FWD is just a no no. I had a ST before my RS, and while I understand they aren't truly relatable (ST and type R), FWD can only be so good in the snow. Plus, not very much fun in the snow.

The way the RS can shoot out of low speed corners is nothing sort of wizardly. I love how it can just push the rear end out when you give it the sauce. It feels like a balanced rwd car. I don't care if it's slower than the type R on the Ring, it's more fun to me

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 

AustinSN

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Beer Money Bros.
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
6,408
Location
the plains
This is a completely uninformed post.

Honda parts and upgrades are cheap as dirt. The Type R is already turbo. Honda motors of this generation are incredibly strong. The S2k will take 500whp all day long on completely stock hardware. I dont doubt this motor will prove to be equally as strong.

The head on this car will outflow the RS by a country mile.

The 2 major knocks against this car IMO are the way it looks LOL and the fact that its FWD.

I would be interested to see the data between both. Cosworth designed the head on the RS, and they aren't really strangers when it comes to making power with 4 bangers.
 

Zemedici

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
21,223
Location
Atlanta, GA
sounds like the dude on the bike cannot ride tbh....my Ninja 1000 would do all of 90+ in 1st gear......
 

Intervention302

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
2,994
Location
NH
sounds like the dude on the bike cannot ride tbh....my Ninja 1000 would do all of 90+ in 1st gear......
He seemed like a cool dude.

Wasn't riding with gear or a helmet though. Shifted at ok speed.

Had it been longer than 60-130 I think he would have passed

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 

92GreenGT

Turbos FTW!!!
Established Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2004
Messages
1,184
Location
Big Stone Gap, VA
whoops, I didn't know the Type R was a turbo car from the factory. I guess I'm used to their old adage of naturally aspirated.

Still, I'd take the RS a million times over. The AWD and looks(which is subjective) make the difference to me. I seen a local Type R sell for 63k, I don't think the RS was bringing that kind of money, that's why I said what I said about the money in my "uninformed" post above.lol
 

Intervention302

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
2,994
Location
NH
whoops, I didn't know the Type R was a turbo car from the factory. I guess I'm used to their old adage of naturally aspirated.

Still, I'd take the RS a million times over. The AWD and looks(which is subjective) make the difference to me. I seen a local Type R sell for 63k, I don't think the RS was bringing that kind of money, that's why I said what I said about the money in my "uninformed" post above.lol

I bought my RS for MSRP.

But I've seen some go for 3-5k over in the beginning

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 

6.0GTO

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
1,249
Location
Colorado
How much of the type R's motor is strung out, I know its a smaller displacement motor compared to the RS. 2.0 vs 2.3

Curious to know which motor will max out first.


The new aluminum 2.5 in the RS3 and TTRS will give either of those motors a good run. But then again I am severely biased.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top