Engine locked up at 4500 miles

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fun4me

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
946
Location
chicago
No. That's part of what is wrong with society today, self entitlement and placing the blame on others.

In this hobby, we choose to modify our vehicles far beyond the design of what our cars are meant for, but yet when something goes wrong rather than taking responsibility for it they rather look to place the blame on a shop that was paid to do the job. The shop can't be held responsible for modifying a car unless they are grossly negilgent for something like leaving a lug nut off a wheel or something. lol.

The owner is ultimately responsible for making the decision to modify his/her own vehicle and accept whatever consquences that come with it.
I though he only had cams? And it the shop didn't feel like the car was "safe" to mod, they should have advised him of that. Just my opinion. Untill the OP chimes in, really cant speculate.
 

JerryC

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
652
Location
Memphis
No. That's part of what is wrong with society today, self entitlement and placing the blame on others.

In this hobby, we choose to modify our vehicles far beyond the design of what our cars are meant for, but yet when something goes wrong rather than taking responsibility for it they rather look to place the blame on a shop that was paid to do the job. The shop can't be held responsible for modifying a car unless they are grossly negilgent for something like leaving a lug nut off a wheel or something. lol.

The owner is ultimately responsible for making the decision to modify his/her own vehicle and accept whatever consquences that come with it.

Nope, you're wrong. The shop has responsibility and a legal obligation to do the job the properly. If the shop installs faulty parts supplied by the shop or does the installation incorrectly, that would be the responsibility of the shop.

If your argument is that the parts are good and the installation was done correctly and the failure is a result of too much HP for the components that were not modified, I'd agree with you.
 

dirtyd88

Much Wow!
Established Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
8,564
Location
Fort Worth, TX
Nope, you're wrong. The shop has responsibility and a legal obligation to do the job the properly. If the shop installs faulty parts supplied by the shop or does the installation incorrectly, that would be the responsibility of the shop.

If your argument is that the parts are good and the installation was done correctly and the failure is a result of too much HP for the components that were not modified, I'd agree with you.

It's already been proven that nothing was installed incorrectly by the shop.
 

Spd2Stang

I just WOT in my pants
Established Member
Joined
May 16, 2011
Messages
833
Location
Keller, TX
Didn't see it mentioned but i think he ran a 250 shot on this car from time to time within that 4500 miles. Im no mechanic, but id say doing that doesn't exactly strengthen the factory rods. Ive had good experiences with the shop in question and they are stand up people. Although its unfortunate the motor locked up BLK2012 was fully aware that block was on borrowed time with level of power he was at.
 

kosovobandit

Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
158
Location
Ft. Worth
No. That's part of what is wrong with society today, self entitlement and placing the blame on others.

In this hobby, we choose to modify our vehicles far beyond the design of what our cars are meant for, but yet when something goes wrong rather than taking responsibility for it they rather look to place the blame on a shop that was paid to do the job. The shop can't be held responsible for modifying a car unless they are grossly negilgent for something like leaving a lug nut off a wheel or something. lol.

The owner is ultimately responsible for making the decision to modify his/her own vehicle and accept whatever consquences that come with it.

You logic is slightly flawed. I totally agree with the entitlement statement but to say the car was pushing its limit is saying every Roush or Ford Racing Whipple car out there making 525-540 flywheel horsepower is at its limit. They come with a warranty and have the same power levels. Why dont they all bend a rod? There is a safe level and a unsafe level. With your logic you have taken your car beyond a safe level lowering it beyond what ford sent from the factory.
 

bambinov8

600WHP LOL
Established Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
2,761
Location
SOUTH FLORIDA
no. That's part of what is wrong with society today, self entitlement and placing the blame on others.

In this hobby, we choose to modify our vehicles far beyond the design of what our cars are meant for, but yet when something goes wrong rather than taking responsibility for it they rather look to place the blame on a shop that was paid to do the job. The shop can't be held responsible for modifying a car unless they are grossly negilgent for something like leaving a lug nut off a wheel or something. Lol.

The owner is ultimately responsible for making the decision to modify his/her own vehicle and accept whatever consquences that come with it.

+1000000
 

Spd2Stang

I just WOT in my pants
Established Member
Joined
May 16, 2011
Messages
833
Location
Keller, TX
Lol i had too.. But Those rods are known to be the weak link on those cars. Time to get stronger and better.. That's all, we all go through that unfortunately.

Your right, IMO its the only downside going with GT and not the Boss.
 

Blazer707@TBR

Master Ford Tech
Authorized Vendor
Joined
Aug 19, 2012
Messages
4,313
Location
Bay Area
Nope, you're wrong. The shop has responsibility and a legal obligation to do the job the properly. If the shop installs faulty parts supplied by the shop or does the installation incorrectly, that would be the responsibility of the shop.

If your argument is that the parts are good and the installation was done correctly and the failure is a result of too much HP for the components that were not modified, I'd agree with you.

Im leaning towards this. Its what happens with automotive repairs. Leave your vehicle with a repair facility and once its in there hands they accept responsibilty of the vehicle.

Either way its just shitty luck.

-Thomas

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 2
 

Scuba-Matt

Boost Freak!!!!!!!!
Established Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2005
Messages
8,542
Location
South East Florida
If the head gasket wasn't weeping and the injector wasn't leaking.
The fact he was running a 250 shot from time to time would probably get the shop off the hook. N20 without the proper octane or tune will wipe out rods and more.
 

JerryC

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
652
Location
Memphis
If the head gasket wasn't weeping and the injector wasn't leaking.
The fact he was running a 250 shot from time to time would probably get the shop off the hook. N20 without the proper octane or tune will wipe out rods and more.

"They drove the car out of the shop and in the shop onto the dyno. They switched out the stock injectors to 60lb ones and then they try to start and it never did and got locked up."

Except that they drove it up on the dyno, installed the injectors and it wouldnt start after that. Can't see it bending the rod for no reason other then just spinning the starter. It had to have a reason for bending the rod.
 

FoofKiller

I> /\/\
Established Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
3,858
Location
state of confusion
I though he only had cams? And it the shop didn't feel like the car was "safe" to mod, they should have advised him of that. Just my opinion. Untill the OP chimes in, really cant speculate.

Nope. The car has been heavily modified for awhile now.

Nope, you're wrong. The shop has responsibility and a legal obligation to do the job the properly. If the shop installs faulty parts supplied by the shop or does the installation incorrectly, that would be the responsibility of the shop.

If your argument is that the parts are good and the installation was done correctly and the failure is a result of too much HP for the components that were not modified, I'd agree with you.

No, you're wrong. The car was there for E85 conversion and a tune. It had already been out on the streets running just fine with the cams beforehand.

Didn't see it mentioned but i think he ran a 250 shot on this car from time to time within that 4500 miles. Im no mechanic, but id say doing that doesn't exactly strengthen the factory rods. Ive had good experiences with the shop in question and they are stand up people. Although its unfortunate the motor locked up BLK2012 was fully aware that block was on borrowed time with level of power he was at.

The car hadn't been run on the 250 shot yet. The previous was a 150 pill.

You logic is slightly flawed. I totally agree with the entitlement statement but to say the car was pushing its limit is saying every Roush or Ford Racing Whipple car out there making 525-540 flywheel horsepower is at its limit. They come with a warranty and have the same power levels. Why dont they all bend a rod? There is a safe level and a unsafe level. With your logic you have taken your car beyond a safe level lowering it beyond what ford sent from the factory.

My point is, that anytime you modify your car from stock, you have to expect at some point there is going to be problems. It just comes with the hobby. You can't expect to modify a car far from factory standards and still expect factory reliability.

We've seen over the years that all cars from the factory aren't built equally either. There is quarterly changes to parts bins at the factories, adjustsments made as failure reports come in etc. Therefor which is why you hear so many different stories about some cars handling more power than others.

It simply comes down to the luck of the draw when buying a car and what is going to happen with it when you start modding it. Just accept that anything can happen in this hobby. They are machines, they are going to fail.

Lol i had too.. But Those rods are known to be the weak link on those cars. Time to get stronger and better.. That's all, we all go through that unfortunately.

That's just the hobby man. Build it, break it, build it better. If it breaks, replace it because it needed to be replaced anyways. lol.
 

injfuel

broke parts again
Established Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
552
Location
Columbus, ohio
No. That's part of what is wrong with society today, self entitlement and placing the blame on others.

In this hobby, we choose to modify our vehicles far beyond the design of what our cars are meant for, but yet when something goes wrong rather than taking responsibility for it they rather look to place the blame on a shop that was paid to do the job. The shop can't be held responsible for modifying a car unless they are grossly negilgent for something like leaving a lug nut off a wheel or something. lol.

The owner is ultimately responsible for making the decision to modify his/her own vehicle and accept whatever consquences that come with it.

Ok so the consensus between him and the shop is that the rod failed because of the increased strain from aftermarket parts right ??? So the car runs then its parked then he tried to start it back up and it's locked up ??? Or did it rotate at all ??
 

BLK2012GT

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
375
Location
Frisco, TX
Lol where this thread went. When I get home I'll give all the details as I can but Steve (foofkiller) has pretty much covered everything. And my car had only a 150 shot and its only been hit 5 times and all five times were on the dyno.
 

injfuel

broke parts again
Established Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
552
Location
Columbus, ohio
"They drove the car out of the shop and in the shop onto the dyno. They switched out the stock injectors to 60lb ones and then they try to start and it never did and got locked up."

Except that they drove it up on the dyno, installed the injectors and it wouldnt start after that. Can't see it bending the rod for no reason other then just spinning the starter. It had to have a reason for bending the rod.

Exactly !!!! , something is missing from this equation !!! Some bit of information ha been left out , you shut a car off and it never starts back up , and the cause is a bent rod ??!!!!?! I'm trying to wrap my head around this , so when the motor got shut off the rod bends ??? Isn't that the only way to say it ??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread



Top