Yeah I mean I know both ways “work” but I guess I’m looking for opinions - my car is currently set up as option 2 but I was seeing varying boost levels in the dyno without touching the controller. I had to turn the controller way down on duty from 20 to 1 to stop an overboost cut. I feel like option 1 would be using the gates more to bleed off and control the boost level? Whereas option 2 is forcing the gate to stay closed as much as it can?Either will work, there is no 'better' way. I would use Option 1 personally, it's simpler.
If you are overshooting boost, you have something else going on. You can sure re-plumb it and switch to option 1 and see if something changes.Yeah I mean I know both ways “work” but I guess I’m looking for opinions - my car is currently set up as option 2 but I was seeing varying boost levels in the dyno without touching the controller. I had to turn the controller way down on duty from 20 to 1 to stop an overboost cut. I feel like option 1 would be using the gates more to bleed off and control the boost level? Whereas option 2 is forcing the gate to stay closed as much as it can?
If you are overshooting boost, you have something else going on. You can sure re-plumb it and switch to option 1 and see if something changes.
That is the exact opposite of reality.from what I've read and seen, it's better to use the turbo as pressure source to prevent boost spike. If you measure after intercooler and throttle body you can see turbo surging and over boost.
Sent from my SM-S911U using the svtperformance.com mobile app
That is the exact opposite of reality.
LMAO...........STFU haha. Whats up buddy? I still have my Galant! I don't drive it much but I do have it.YOU are NOT still driving that 4g63 fookin turd, are you?????????
LMAO...........STFU haha. Whats up buddy? I still have my Galant! I don't drive it much but I do have it.
I do have other projects though. DM me.