I can see this going to smack-down....:beer:
Hope you're not a law student. This one would get bounced right back to you with little or no comment, because it would require too much ink.
So far, so good, you appear to be proficient with a search engine...
Kind of a long leap, but you landed in the right spot, so let's continue...
Ok, we just went WAY off course. You've just made a judgment that "we" followed the rules and "they" denied coverage... Hardly "breach". You've got a disputed issue around a warranty claim which is well within the contract. The seat argument is kind of an absurdity--but it certainly isn't "fraud".
Bad form. First, just because you think it, doesn't make it fact, or that "we all know it". Quite the contrary.
See, you've even acknowledged that the people who built the car can make a legitimate (albeit somewhat strained) claim that your actions contributed to the defect, thereby releasing them from their warranty obligation. Hardly "fraud".
I see flawed logic at best.
I can see this going to smack-down....:beer:
For what reason? I have no issue with either of these 2. I actually like how Husky broke down everything I said and logically talked it out rather than Chris who just throws insults but regardless it really doesn't matter to me.
As I said then my logic was flawed. It really doesn't matter at all. By next year my car is sold for a different one.
This seems very simple to me. You play you pay. It's a matter of integrity. At the end of the day that's all you have.
This seems very simple to me. You play you pay. It's a matter of integrity. At the end of the day that's all you have.
"I only have two things in this world, my word and my balls....and I don't break them for nobody"
As for climate a good tuner could send you an email tune and be dead on.
The dealer I'd take my car to for an issue told me that is I unloaded the tune that he'd not have a problem servicing the car under warranty. Only if the issue was an obvious engine burn up from A/F issues or obviously from a bad tune would he have an issue, otherwise, no biggy. Now, I'd not like to test that. I once had a dealership try to void my warranty because they found timeslips in the center console. I lost my mind, why were they going thry my car in the 1st place, oh, and the slips were in the 10.20's and my car had 1,000 mis on it and bone stock barely able to hit a 12 sec ET. THe slips were from my Ninja at the track. A-holes. It's all about the dealer / service manager and the regional SVT rep if you get into a battle, it's all a risk.
I too would like to swap a 3.73 and maintain the warranty, seems like you could buy FRPP gears & install at dealer with the computer updating for the gears & not void a warranty, but I guess that's too much to ask.
that's not fraud.
That's denial of coverage. Take it to a different dealer.
why am i not surprised that you would be the one to say this?