The “leaked” document is full of misspelling and numerical errors.
I call bull shit.
I call bull shit.
All I'll say is those numbers are lower than what the car was making a year ago, and it won't be officially unveiled for a while yet...
Things may have changed in the time being, but I doubt it's gone that sideways.
And a 190mph top speed is a let down. I know I’ll never take one that fast, but bragging rights and knowing a car is capable of the 200mph mark is a good feeling. I think this leaked document may be bullshit. I don’t think a mustang has ever weighed 4000+lbs either
Pretty much my response
Reasons why this is bullshit.
1. Petrol, not Patrol
2. "supercharged" would have been capitalized
3. The output would not be "No commercial usage.", instead it would say "YES" or "NO".
4. It would say "not applicable" or "N/A", not "No trailer tow."
5. It wouldn't explain itself, it would just say 4905 lbs.
View attachment 1510613
That's a bit of a letdown.
56 more HP and 30 more TQ than a 13/14....and @370lbs heavier!
Reasons why this is bullshit.
1. Petrol, not Patrol
2. "supercharged" would have been capitalized
3. The output would not be "No commercial usage.", instead it would say "YES" or "NO".
4. It would say "not applicable" or "N/A", not "No trailer tow."
5. It wouldn't explain itself, it would just say 4905 lbs.
View attachment 1510613
Is this the European model?!?!?7. wheelbase is cited in inches not millimeters. (wheelbase in millimeters, really?)
Add:
6. Driveshaft dimension is not a measurement
7. wheelbase is cited in inches not millimeters. (wheelbase in millimeters, really?)