LS Boss,
Let's talk about Motorcraft 5W-50.
Ford states MC5W-50 is recommended in the Track Pack GT, 302 Boss, and GT500 up to 7,500-10,000 miles (depending on model). However, this lubricant shears to a light 40 grade in 1,500 miles. Assuming Ford engineers are as smart as you say they are, one could safely assume that using a 40 grade lubricant that does not shear in this engine will be perfectly acceptable for the entire OCI.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
I'd also like to bring up that your beloved PhD's don't always get to call the shots on what product is actually chosen for final production. Nope, the bean counters do that. Know how I know? A former engine durability engineer for the 4.6L 3V engine in the 2005-2010 Mustang recommended that Ford stick with the 5W-30 specification for this engine. After more than 100 tear downs testing both grades, a significant decrease in wear was witnessed using 5W-30. Do you think the bean counters listened? Heck no! They knew the engine would still make it far outside the normal warranty period and would never be an expense to Ford. The bean counters also knew they would pay more fines due to CAFE laws in the good ol' USA using the more viscous lubricant. The engine getting .5 mpg less would cost them millions in fines to the federal government.
What's really sad is.....
Comparing Motorcraft 5W-20 to Amsoil AZO 0W-30 in a 2008 Mustang GT 4.6L 3V showed a 1 mpg efficiency improvement from Amsoil. The base stock and additives play a vital role, not simply viscosity.
Seriously, I respect your credentials and knowledge in your field, but in all honesty.....you really haven't a clue about this topic.
Let's talk about Motorcraft 5W-50.
Ford states MC5W-50 is recommended in the Track Pack GT, 302 Boss, and GT500 up to 7,500-10,000 miles (depending on model). However, this lubricant shears to a light 40 grade in 1,500 miles. Assuming Ford engineers are as smart as you say they are, one could safely assume that using a 40 grade lubricant that does not shear in this engine will be perfectly acceptable for the entire OCI.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
I'd also like to bring up that your beloved PhD's don't always get to call the shots on what product is actually chosen for final production. Nope, the bean counters do that. Know how I know? A former engine durability engineer for the 4.6L 3V engine in the 2005-2010 Mustang recommended that Ford stick with the 5W-30 specification for this engine. After more than 100 tear downs testing both grades, a significant decrease in wear was witnessed using 5W-30. Do you think the bean counters listened? Heck no! They knew the engine would still make it far outside the normal warranty period and would never be an expense to Ford. The bean counters also knew they would pay more fines due to CAFE laws in the good ol' USA using the more viscous lubricant. The engine getting .5 mpg less would cost them millions in fines to the federal government.
What's really sad is.....
Comparing Motorcraft 5W-20 to Amsoil AZO 0W-30 in a 2008 Mustang GT 4.6L 3V showed a 1 mpg efficiency improvement from Amsoil. The base stock and additives play a vital role, not simply viscosity.
Seriously, I respect your credentials and knowledge in your field, but in all honesty.....you really haven't a clue about this topic.
Last edited: