My new 01 cobra has no low end torque at all!!
- Thread starter svt*girl
- Start date
...
Last edited:
2001SVTsnake said:
well THERE'S your problem....
i was basing it off of my previous 01 that made 327 rwhp and my current 01 traps the same in the 1/8 mile w/ about the same weight...
I think someone should come out with svt%women, and post how come my 99 cobra has no top end power(then the troll never post again) and have 100 guys talking trash about their hp's and timeslips, then little billy comes out with his 5 year plan(like nobody ever has kids are grows up) my monster engine will smash all of you!!! PLEASE!!!!
mine dyno'd 319rwhp but it was std not sae
that was with: tune, flowmaster 40's, ported intake, k&n, o/r x, diablo chip
then i added slp1's, u/d's not tuned so dunno know but im guessing around 310rwhp
people on mustang forums did not believe my numbers. there is like a 5 page argument about it. then i realised it was std
they were telling me people can make a dyno chart read w/e. which i agree. but i mean come on we know whats realistic and not
im just saying was yours std?
that was with: tune, flowmaster 40's, ported intake, k&n, o/r x, diablo chip
then i added slp1's, u/d's not tuned so dunno know but im guessing around 310rwhp
people on mustang forums did not believe my numbers. there is like a 5 page argument about it. then i realised it was std
they were telling me people can make a dyno chart read w/e. which i agree. but i mean come on we know whats realistic and not
im just saying was yours std?
Last edited:
EVLSVT said:
do you have long tubes?
what do you mean by exhaust just cat back?
this thread is almost entertaining.......... almost
tbizzle said:
Hahaha! This is why I love being a new edge owner. We're bastard stepchildren that fight a lot!
2001SVTsnake said:
so you have dyno numbers in your sig that are guesstimated??
LOL...the 327 i mentioned was SAE...STD was like 337 i think....sure you can make a dyno chart read whatever you want, but not in SAE, that is corrected to a standard for atmospheric conditions...
2001SVTsnake said:
There is your problem right there.
Oh and some tuners are better than others and some cars are stronger than others.
yea. well they say std is 4% higher then sae so if i got a couple horses from u/d's and slp1's i would be around 310 sae
it was just hilarious i think most of the people bitching were just jealous because they had a 2v.
it was just hilarious i think most of the people bitching were just jealous because they had a 2v.
My car made 314 RHWP SAE with bolt-ons.
Now, when someone wants to talk about something that really matters (dyno numbers do not), like ETs or lap times, then I for one, am game.
Can someone translate this for me, please?
Now, when someone wants to talk about something that really matters (dyno numbers do not), like ETs or lap times, then I for one, am game.
JoePac said:
Can someone translate this for me, please?
yea my et's suck
me best is a 13.3 sumthin on street tires and my 3rd gear sync is kinda screwed up ( cant always get in)
me best is a 13.3 sumthin on street tires and my 3rd gear sync is kinda screwed up ( cant always get in)
cobraracer46
Banned
As of yesterday, my Cobra lost a good amount of low end tourqe because I finished installing a Viper T56 with the stock 3.27 still in the rear, but set of 430 gears along with a T2R diff is going in real quick!
2.66 * 3.27 = Getting beat to 60 mph by good-running Hyundais!
I don't recall a Viper T56 being approved by Ford Engineers...
cobraracer46 said:
should have gotten the '00R spec t56, w/ the 2.97 first gear...wouldn't have killed your acceleration so much...
Users who are viewing this thread
