:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: WTF??? :lol::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
funny, that how i was when i read your previous post..:shrug: lol
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: WTF??? :lol::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I don't know where you get this from. Anybody who doesn't understand this is an idiot. It pretty much goes without saying.I think alot of people do not realize that a vast majority of boxers come from the streets.
yes it happens but it does not have to happen as has been shown by many fighters that have shown class and personal responsibility.It's not like the average educated person would want to get involved in a sport where you get punched in th face for 12 rounds. So whenever you put someone who is uneducated together with ALOT of money and fame 9/10 that person is going to have problems. Thats not always the case nor is it an excuse, but it happens.
Show me one place where anyone said he was not very good in his prime ..just one. And QUOTE it don't paraphrase something into it that isn't there. While he may have given SOME in history problems I think there are some that would take him down inside of 5 rounds. there is no doubt he could hold his own against them for awhile at least.To say Tyson was not very good in his prime is ridiculous! In his prime I would bet he would give any heavyweight champion in history PROBLEMS!
Overstated a bit IMHO but you are certainly entitled to your opinion. You would rank him higher than I would.I actually saw him at Universal studios a couple of years back and got a picture with him. He is very short in person and is very fat nowadays but still intimidating. I shook his hand and they felt like bricks! tyson could have been alot better had it not been for his legal problems and lack of focus and discipline. After awhile it seemed like he did not really want to fight anymore and only did it for the money. I would still put him at around # 9 on my list of top Heavyweights of all time. He did alot to promote the sport of boxing and make it grow. Even if he was crazy at times
funny, that how i was when i read your previous post..:shrug: lol
Who do you think was a better Heavyweight fighter then Tyson?
Ali, Dempsey, Frazier, Holyfield, Lewis, chavez, hagler, and maywether to name a few
Ali, Dempsey, Frazier, Holyfield, Lewis, chavez, hagler, and maywether to name a few
Ali, Dempsey, Frazier, Holyfield, Lewis, chavez, hagler, and maywether to name a few
yea, your a boxing fan alright
Ali, Dempsey, Frazier, Holyfield, Lewis, chavez, hagler, and maywether to name a few
Either you don't know shit about boxing or you misunderstood the question because half the people you mentioned are not heavyweights. I think Tyson in his prime would have K.Oed frazier and Dempsey. Ali would have outboxed him in a VERY competitive fight.
see my post right above this one for my response. Again everything but him being a thug is a matter of opinion. There are a LOT of "experts" that would disagree with everyone here about whether he is the greatest or even in the top 10.
Ring Magazine rated Tyson number 68 in the list of " 80 greatest fighters of all time"
Ring Magazine's list of the 80 Best Fighters of the Last 80 Years - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Just to show you how much controversy there is over this Ring lists him as number 14 on their list of "greatest heavyweights" while another guy lists him as number 4. so anyone here who is hung up on him being any certain place on their "all time heavyweights" list has about as much clue about it as I do which is really not much.
My point is that he is a thug and a brawler I think that has been shown in his history I posted earlier in the thread.
and he was a thug in the ring as well as out of it. he has not clue what the meaning of the word "sportsmanship" is, and frankly you SHOULD care about that.
Alot of the supposed "greatest" fighters in history had what what many people would consider poor sportsmanship. Ali, Roberto Duran, Bernard Hopkins and Floyd mayweather jr. just to name a few.
And that is kind of my point. everything in this thread is pretty much opinions of people who, while passionate in their opinions, are not experts and even the experts don't agree.It still does not take away from their greatness inside the ring. But hey, your entitled to your opinion just like I am. I don't have to agree with you but I respect your opinion.
actually on this we are in 100% in agreement. Sugar Ray was awesome and I do agree that he should in no way be ranked lower than Duran. I watched Sugar Ray in the olympics and for some time afterwards. He was and is a class act both inside and outside the ring.I find it funny that the Ring magazine rated Roberto Duran higher than Sugar ray Leonard when Ray Leonard was a champion in 6 different weight classes vs Duran being champion in four. that and the fact that Leonard beat Duran twice makes it rather impractical to rank Duran higher..
The world is full of stories of people that came off the streets without being the thug that tyson was. You use this the same way he does as an excuse for his behavior. There is NO excuse for his behavior. yeah he had a tough life but instead of rising above it he embraced it since it would theoretically allow him to get away with the crap he did.Funny I would like to see how some of you would of turned out comming off the streets...
Tyson knew better he just CHOSE not to live better. If he didn't know better he would never have been embarrassed about his behavior. Which he said he was on more than one occasion. There is also no question that his relationship with Don King was a bad move but he needed psychological help way before that and CHOSE not to get it.Tyson was ignorant and didnt know any better and Don King really ****ed that guy up! After Rooney died it was downhill for Tyson...
could be but again that was a choice HE made.And I believe Tyson was a fan of cheque drops....