Is this the contest that lethal was bribing people online to vote for them?
I just went by the build sheet.
I see that complaint a lot, and to me it's like Tampa Bay Rays complaining that the Yankees have deeper pockets. It's all the same game, and he who is willing to spend the most and can do so wisely will typically win.
BS This is a horse crap response if I ever read one. These shops either need to compete with other shops at these events or they are going to tick their customers off. They get parts at cost and then get to write them off at the end of the year. The last I check I couldn't do that.
I spoke about this to a few people yesterday and we will no longer be buying parts from shops that compete against their customers on this level. These KOTS events were intended for the average joe and having a shop backed car with unlimited funds take the win will ruin these events.
BTW How can anyone be considered a winner if not all of the events where ran?
Well if I get slapped with anything for calling Lethal out on this I can say one thing...I am not alone. SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL SHOPS!!
I understand what you mean.. But like someone mentioned they get parts at cost, or for free from sponsors.. then get to write them off at the end of the year.. Hell the whole car is a write off lol.. I get what you mean.. Deep pockets go a long way, but I remember when it was all based on the average joe that's all.. I mean hell some of the guys on here are average joe.. Own their own business, military (a lot of us) and have very high hp cars.. some in the 1300hp range I guess. But to me it's nice to read up on the guys like me and 90% of this forum that do it at almost full price :beer:
Also with Lund only doing the progressive power control thing with that one GT500 doesn't seem fair.. a shit ton of the competition was Lund tuned.. to offer it to only 1 is kinda BS.. lol..
Like I said it was just a observation..
SID297,
Some good points but I disagree with others. Maybe you are right and this should be taken to the presenter of the event. Seems like these started out as car guys taking their cars to play but just like everything else it is slowly getting to the point where it’s going to only be shops battling it out for advertisement time.
SID297,
Some good points but I disagree with others. Maybe you are right and this should be taken to the presenter of the event. Seems like these started out as car guys taking their cars to play but just like everything else it is slowly getting to the point where it’s going to only be shops battling it out for advertisement time.
Another area I disagree with is how one sided the article above is. I guess I can take the other side and say it sounds like nut swinging if you can say what I posted sounded like hatred. Then again it might be hate of shops not leaving any form of competition for anyone other then people who do this for a living. I think they should be careful of that because we are the ones that put food on their families tables.
Think about the natural progression of any successful contest. I'll use The King of the Hammers offroad race as an example. In less than a decade it went from a few guys with their trail trucks to a field of hundreds of purpose built moon buggies with build sheets stacking up into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Is that unfair? The KOTS competition has been around for ten years. Competition improves the breed and the cream rises to the top. There can only be one King, and that vehicle should be the best. Period.
Do you complain that NMCA allows Mike Murillo to race in 10.5? He owns a shop. What about Willard Kinzer? He's an octogenarian billionaire. I don't hear any of those guys complaining because they want to be the best. Not the best out of a handful of guys at the local 1/8 mile, the best on a national scale. They want championships, not participation trophies. 5.0/NMCA sets the rules and then leaves it to the competitors, whomever they may be, to build their cars how they see fit. Limiting those who can participate merely cheapens the contest and the victory. It's like a kid being the smartest in his class, except for the fact that he's home schooled.
Also, the article is about the winner of the contest and what went into building the winning car. How would it be biased if it is only about one participate? If you want to read about everyone in the contest pick up a copy of 5.0. Your argument that the article is nutswinging is specious at best, and is more accurately a textbook example of several logical fallacies (simple evasion, ad hominem, shifting ground, etc).
My thoughts are that they need to put the shop owned cars into a class and have the weekend guys show what they have by having their own class. End of story!
Are you seriously saying that you can’t tell a shop sponsored car from a guy doing this for fun? Do you think a shop is going to help with a car if they are not mentioned if you win or have stickers on the car of some kind?
Thank you for making my point for me. By having two classes for entrants how can one call the winner 'King' Of The Street?
Hey, you made the distinction between the two, so go ahead and classify each entrant on the basis of what you see or think. You've now created another group of entrants, the ones that will feel as if they weren't treated fairly when being told which class they'll fall into. Point being, keep it simple. Want to slay Goliath on a budget? Figure out a way to do it and bring it.
Shouldn't be hard to split the classes up because what shop wants to advertise as being KOTS by winning over all weekend guys. That would be like Jeff Lutz showing up to a local drag night and taking the $100 prize money for fastest street car.
Lame