KB 2.4!!! Right now on 15# and pump gas 603rwhp 21# pulley to come... 
epper: :banana: epper: :banana:
epper: :banana: epper: :banana:
kb 2.4 or whipple 2.3
- Thread starter 1BadKB03
- Start date
600rwhp at 15#s . I know which one I'd choose. :coolman:
. I know which one I'd choose. :coolman:ghostcobra04
New Member
blower
i just got back from the hotrod power tour and when i was in albama i talked to this guy at speedsouth he installs prochargers and he saids hes making 600-700 rwhp have you heard of that speed shop and are the good
i just got back from the hotrod power tour and when i was in albama i talked to this guy at speedsouth he installs prochargers and he saids hes making 600-700 rwhp have you heard of that speed shop and are the good
dfw99cobra said:Turbo + good tune and you'd be fine same w/ procharger. That's all right though, save the turbo for me.
with that procharger your talking about or the tubro either one. that damn car would not a daily driver you would need to **** with it all the time.
oke:
TieBreaker said:with that procharger your talking about or the tubro either one. that damn car would not a daily driver you would need to **** with it all the time.
We will see, we will see. :thumbsup:
Whipple 2.3 @ 15lbs - 586 rwhp SAE and only 18.5* timing. On pump gas. Could easily hit 600 if we upped the timing a tad. I have no track times yet cause I am breaking in my new clutch.
WhippleCharged Sonic said:
I have no doubt in my mind that a whipple is bad a**, but what i want to know is which one is better. you say that you put down 586 which is a strong number. but would a kb at the same timing and same boost do more or less horsepower wise.
TieBreaker said:
Well, do some searches and you will find a TON of debates. Here is a little tech info that was posted on the other board. Start there..that should give you some good info
http://www.modularfords.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24016&highlight=compressor+map
WhippleCharged Sonic said:
that actually helped out a whole bunch, thanks. so what it was saying is the kb is actaully better at lower speeds, but the whipple takes it out on higher speeds and on how much heat it produces. thanks man :thumbsup:
First I would find out if you could get a Whipple. Kenne Bell seems to have there blowers in stock unlike Whipple. It sucks that anyone should have to wait many months for anything.I took my name off the waiting list for Whipples 3.3, I found that Weiand makes a 1425 CFM compressor that should feed my 427 Lightning. To bad Kenne Bell doesn't offer a 3.3.
i got a kb for my truck lol if that helps any
lates ron,
lates ron,
yea a 3.3L blower on a 4.6 motor lol thats overkill lol. plus you need a different hood and custom made parts to have that blower work on the cobra.
some people have driven whipple cobras and kb cobras and said the kb is a bit more violent with the boost, more snappy
some people have driven whipple cobras and kb cobras and said the kb is a bit more violent with the boost, more snappy
The 2.2 will not support a 427 stroker. It wont see the HP you guys see on your modular motors. The 3.3 would be better for strokers BUT they cant get them to customers.Thats why I took my name off the list and went with the Wieand 256 pro street blower.
Just did a whipple on my car, finally layed down the numbers at PHP and it made 634 on 17lbs (on blower) with other mods. I saved 1000 dollars and whipple actually answers the phone when you have questions--unlike the KB guys.
Your choice...the both blow alot of air
Your choice...the both blow alot of air
I said a KB 2.4 at first....but just bought a polished whipple!! Will be installing and tunning it next week. I will post #'s when I get them! But That KB 2.4 sure looks awsome.....
shhh
be quiet and get that blower off already..slacker! lol
be quiet and get that blower off already..slacker! lol
this is not cobra related but did anyone see the article with the 2.4 kb on the new gt. i think they said if the clutch didnt give out it would have made 600rwhp on 14lbs of boost
Users who are viewing this thread
