the cars an 03, very lightly modded. the mod list includes Spec 3+ clutch, K&N FIPK, 3" cat back, 2.76 billet flow pulley with idlers/tensioner, its also got the billet flow IRS brace and MM IRS bushings but those done help on the dyno. I'm at 435hp and 453tq. The Af's are in the 12's across the board. How does this sound to you experienced guys? I heard guys on here say they were getting more with the same set up.... I'm still happy though, the car hauls ass!
How are my numbers....
- Thread starter Apexslider
- Start date
What exactly does in the 12's mean? Sounds a little iffy.Apexslider said:
sound about right no midpipe?
my 03 put down 456/484 with a cai, 2.8, midpipe and catback. Plus, obviously tuned. I think they are low.
12's?? Kinda lean
Could be the tune but people with a 2.76 upper usually make around 440-460rwhp range...are you running a midpipe?
Could be the tune but people with a 2.76 upper usually make around 440-460rwhp range...are you running a midpipe?
Definetly sounds a little low to me. What kind of tune you got?
Well he didnt mention a tune so.. that might be one of the reasons.
12's is scary high. 12.0:1 should be the highest. Mine is tuned to 11.5 to be safe. That's lean. On borrowed time with that afr. Then again aren't we all to some extent?
just a little low, what dyno? bmy a/f is 11.8 straight across, anything above 12.0 is to lean in my opinion
I'm running stock midpipe, and to be honest I'm not sure of the tune. When I got the pulley I also got a Diablosport Predator, I wasn't there when it went on the dyno and I haven't plugged the programmer in for my self to see what ever it is you can see. There also lies the other problem, I have no clue how to use the programmer! I haven't looked at any instructions yet, but I'm taking it with me to the track tomorrow night becasue I don't like af's in the 12's. My last forced induction car I had down in the low 11's and felt safe, these 12's make me nervous.
your torque is a bit low and like these fine gentlemen mentioned, 12.x A/F is flirting with disaster.
fatten it up to 11.5-8 you might lose a couple of ponies but its better than buying a motor.
fatten it up to 11.5-8 you might lose a couple of ponies but its better than buying a motor.
I agree. Mine was in the 11.5 range and I was very pleased.LTHL VNM said:
Although his number are a bit low for the combo, I'd definitely check on the timing. Refine the tune a bit and you should pick up some power/torque. Definitely refine the A/F. I would not run it daily that lean. JMO.
Apexslider, can you post the dyno sheet?
I can try to post it. My scanner isn't working, but maybe I can get a good picture of it...
If you were on a Mustang (or any Eddy Current) dyno, I would say those #'s are dead on. Either way, I would make sure the car is custom tuned and not running on a predator canned tune. Just my .02.
Those numbers are low by about 30rwhp. I didn't see any mention of a CAI/RAI are you running one?
mkscobra01
Banned
93 347 Cobra said:
K&N FIPK....hmmm
^^^ Thanks
Posi - Once I figure out how to use the programmer I will change those settings and see what it does.
And it was done on a Dynojet, and I think it is the canned tune....
Posi - Once I figure out how to use the programmer I will change those settings and see what it does.
And it was done on a Dynojet, and I think it is the canned tune....
Last edited:
Apexslider said:
That makes sense, the canned tune is terrible. At least buy an email tune, I bet you'll pick up those 20-30 horses without even dynoing.
Users who are viewing this thread
