Here's the opinion:
This could have big implications going forward.
Last edited:
This ruling was good! The 'Remain in Mexico' policy ruling is unfortunate though.
The problem with the letter agency boys is that they have unlimited resources to take these cases to court. Only when you get some agency with enough cash to fight them do you get results.
They know it too. But you can’t tax and profit off of that narrativeMost of North America was under a sheet of ice centuries ago.
How did it melt back then without mankind, cars, factories, coal, etc.?
Do we as a society contribute to climate change? Absolutely.
But not to the effect the doomsdayers say. The earth will get warmer, and maybe in 20,000 years it will cool off again.
Yet the ****tards say “follow the science“ when they want to control your lives…Most of North America was under a sheet of ice centuries ago.
How did it melt back then without mankind, cars, factories, coal, etc.?
Do we as a society contribute to climate change? Absolutely.
But not to the effect the doomsdayers say. The earth will get warmer, and maybe in 20,000 years it will cool off again.
Kind of funny seeing the outrage. The Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that the federal government's power should be limited, and that laws should be handled by the legislative branch.
If you listen to a lot of people, this is literally fascism.
So was her decision based on law or beliefs?
Justice Kagan warns parts of East Coast could be 'swallowed by the ocean' in dissent in EPA case
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan warned of the dangers of climate change in her dissenting opinion issued in the case West Virginia v. EPA.www.foxbusiness.com