You obviously failed physics.
This is absolutely retarded.
You obviously failed physics.
This is absolutely retarded.
how the **** has this thread made it 3 pages??? some people in here obviously don't understand the basic concepts of physics being taught in middle school science classes. all other things being as equal as possible, the person with shorter arms will expend less energy to lift the same weight than the person with longer arms. this shit is just common sense.
how the **** has this thread made it 3 pages??? some people in here obviously don't understand the basic concepts of physics being taught in middle school science classes. all other things being as equal as possible, the person with shorter arms will expend less energy to lift the same weight than the person with longer arms. this shit is just common sense.
Ive seen a guy with short arms benched 400+
Granted it took him a few yrs to get there and his genetic played a roll too
nah, i'm talking "simple machines" stuff taught in middle school, if not late elementary school. the 'lever' being the obvious focus of this discussion. this sure as hell isn't any high level physics we're talking about here:lol1:The physics here are taught in high school, but yes, I agree, its simple as physics, there really is no debate.
LMAO, no doubt. i'd trade the advantage in bench, squat, and deadlift to be just a little bit taller than 5'5":lol1: despite being this height though, i've never really enjoyed bench presses of any type. but i'm that weird guy in every gym who loves leg day... :lol1:Agreed.
Hell, every weightlifting buddy I ever had that was 6' or over used to always bitch on bench day. They even used to talk about how when it came to pressing movements they were jealous of how much easier it was for me (I'm 5'6"). Every single one of them said this. But, of course the grass is always greener on the other side. Obviously none of them that were over 6' would trade being over 6' just to be able to bench more. :lol:
yea, you really go to a lot of lifting meets, huh:lol: do you mean, the majority of super heavyweight power lifters are "big tall dudes"? and, by "tall", do you mean ~6'0", 6'1"? the height argument goes out the window(as far as sub-5'10" lifters go) simply because of the fact that a larger(I.E., taller) frame can hold more muscle than a smaller one. there are limits to how much muscle your frame can hold, and obviously shorter lifters hit the wall sooner than taller lifters.people who do the "shorter limbs are stronger" are just making excuses for their lack of strength, IMO. the majority of power lifters are big tall dudes.
yea, you really go to a lot of lifting meets, huh:lol: do you mean, the majority of super heavyweight power lifters are "big tall dudes"? and, by "tall", do you mean ~6'0", 6'1"? the height argument goes out the window(as far as sub-5'10" lifters go) simply because of the fact that a larger(I.E., taller) frame can hold more muscle than a smaller one. there are limits to how much muscle your frame can hold, and obviously shorter lifters hit the wall sooner than taller lifters.
however, weight lifted vs bodyweight isn't linear, it's digressive. although a "maxed out"(so to speak) 6'1" guy can lift a greater amount of weight vs an equivalent 5'1" guy, the 5'1" lifter will put up a greater amount vs his bodyweight. (this being in theory obviously, which doesn't neccessarily play out in the real world due to the fact that we're talking about human beings)
wow, i didn't know the average height of american males was considered "tall":bored:Oh, so being short is an advantage until you get to the really strong guy. makes plenty of sense :lol:
Stop looking at the "strong guys in the gym" and start looking at the pros. They're all "big tall dudes", ie. 5'11"+
wow, i didn't know the average height of american males was considered "tall":bored:
why don't you look at the pros? you're making it plainly obvious that you know shit all about powerlifting. you probably don't even know who the hell ed coan is:rollseyes
Human height - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaU.S. 1.763 m (5 ft 9 1⁄2 in) 1.622 m (5 ft 4 in) 1.09 All Americans, 20+ 91.0% Measured 2003–2006 [104]
let me break this down real easy like for your simpleton mind - BEING SHORT IS A MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE. pro-tip: read the thread title again - Bench press advantage, long vs short arms:bash: it does make plenty of sense, your little peanut brain just isn't capable of comprehending it.
easy. this isn't smackdown.
i'll just leave this here, to help you back pedal a bit.
Human height - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
5'9.5" is a far cry from the "average guy @ 6 feet" according to you.
Bruce Wilhelm - 6'2"
Jesse Marunde - 6'4"
Bill Kazmaier - 6'2"
Just a few random power lifters. Let me know if you need me to look up more. Although i'm sure you don't, since you're clearly an expert on the subject.
Good thing no average guys, at 5'9", want to be a strongman. According to your logic, they'd be running the show.
Strongman competitions are much different than just traditional benching.
It's not tall and short.... Having long arms is a disadvantage, you could be a short ape and have long knuckle draggers.
That said, shorter arms is easier. Anyone that thinks otherwise is an idiot.
this isn't smackdown, that's why i stopped at "you know shit all about powerlifting".easy. this isn't smackdown.
i'll just leave this here, to help you back pedal a bit.
Human height - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
5'9.5" is a far cry from the "average guy @ 6 feet" according to you.
Bruce Wilhelm - 6'2"
Jesse Marunde - 6'4"
Bill Kazmaier - 6'2"
Just a few random power lifters. Let me know if you need me to look up more. Although i'm sure you don't, since you're clearly an expert on the subject.
Good thing no average guys, at 5'9", want to be a strongman. According to your logic, they'd be running the show.
I've always thought that shorter people have less travel so it's easier..