Anyone watch 'Greyhound' with Tom Hanks yet? I'm watching it now.

CobraBob

Authorized Vendor
Established Member
Premium Member
Single Barrel Sirs
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
105,579
Location
Cheshire, CT
So I'm about 30 minutes or so into it. Lots of action and I'm glued to the TV. Sounds great on my home theater system. I've waited months for the movie to launch, which was yesterday on AppleTV. I highly recommend it! Awesome WW2 movie!
 

Canuck03SVT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
1,052
Location
NB
I saw an advertisement for it a while ago and completely forgot about it. Definitely gonna check it out.
 

CobraBob

Authorized Vendor
Established Member
Premium Member
Single Barrel Sirs
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
105,579
Location
Cheshire, CT
You'll like it, I think. Definitely worth a watch. I'm glad I watch it. Hanks did a great acting job as commander of the Greyhound. A good cat and mouse battle between a wolf pack of German subs vs. the convoy destroyers led by Greyhound.
 

L8APEX

*Turbo Not to Scale
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,746
Location
The Air Capitol
Watched it last night really liked it. Great movie.

Don't understand why the U-boats surfaced so much.

Sent from my SM-G986U using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Because of the limits of technology they were basically boats that could submerge. That's why the bow design is for running on the surface and not teardrop like a modern nuclear sub that can run underwater indefinitely.

Because speed and range were severely limited underwater while running on battery power, U-boats were required to spend most of their time surfaced running on diesel engines, diving only when attacked or for rare daytime torpedo strikes. The more ship-like hull design reflects the fact that these were primarily surface vessels that could submerge when necessary.

Sent from my Note9
 

CobraBob

Authorized Vendor
Established Member
Premium Member
Single Barrel Sirs
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
105,579
Location
Cheshire, CT
Because of the limits of technology they were basically boats that could submerge. That's why the bow design is for running on the surface and not teardrop like a modern nuclear sub that can run underwater indefinitely.

Because speed and range were severely limited underwater while running on battery power, U-boats were required to spend most of their time surfaced running on diesel engines, diving only when attacked or for rare daytime torpedo strikes. The more ship-like hull design reflects the fact that these were primarily surface vessels that could submerge when necessary.

Sent from my Note9
Interesting notes. I'm a Navy vet, but know very little about submarines. Thanks.
 

Silverstrike

It's to big to move FAST!
Established Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Messages
8,651
Location
Here/there/some other silly place
Yes the max average life for underwater operations was about 12 hours any more then the build up of CO2 could aspexiated the crew and they would be first knocked out and then later die from a lack of oxygen, this was the max if they only kept their speed at 1/3rd or about 2 knots max any faster on the speed setting and endurance would would take a nose dive if they was on a 2/3rd speed setting than it was only about 6 hours 3/4th and flank 5-9 knots and you was looking at about 2 hours max. Then they was stuck and either had to blow ballast tanks and surface or sit right there if they had no Compressed air in the tanks to purge the water out of them and so basically die as they couldn't go forward and so be ablee to use the dive planes to surface.


Thing that is total garbage is the whole taunting over the radio unless the Germans would know first hand what this current convoy frequency was that never happened. Other than that most things are accurate with the weapons, their delivery and tactics used on both sides.
 

Klaus

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
13,821
Location
minnesota
Is that the movie that he caught the rona during production?
 

Outlaw99

Join us.
Moderator
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
18,163
Location
North Carolina
Was the Greyhound a destroyer? Why was there only 1 in that entire fleet? Knowing how many Uboats are out there you'd think they would have more offensive war ships. Did allied subs not go along? No carrier?

Sent from my SM-G986U using the svtperformance.com mobile app
 

Silverstrike

It's to big to move FAST!
Established Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Messages
8,651
Location
Here/there/some other silly place
Was the Greyhound a destroyer? Why was there only 1 in that entire fleet? Knowing how many Uboats are out there you'd think they would have more offensive war ships. Did allied subs not go along? No carrier?

Sent from my SM-G986U using the svtperformance.com mobile app


Depends on the year if this was pre summer of 1943 then there was about 1 escort for every 7-10 merchants after this period then it was about 1 for every 5 then from winter of 1943-44 to spring of 44 it was almost 1 to 3 after D-day to the end of the war it was almost 2 to 1 ratio and hence why the Germans would be lucky to sink 10-15 merchants in a month unlike the 1940- to early 42 where they sunk 200-500 a month or as it was known the Happy Times.
 

MachME

2V Power
Established Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2005
Messages
5,896
Location
Z
There are some crazy conspiracy stories, but would you ever know anyone to travel any where with a typewriter? Yes, an actual typewriter. Tom Hanks did to Australia, where he then announced he had the Corona virus.....the type writer was also called Corona. That just seems weird as hell.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top