Both are sweet engines. We really are spoiled with our aftermarket and how cheap we can make power on both platforms.
Great discussion fellas. I was expecting the LT5 Mercury debate to happen here. Keep it going.
I also agree to a competition with set parameters, making the competition more nail biting. Same thing in NASCAR, getting beat by another driver, not a more expensive, better sponsored car. However, when GM guys bash the Coyote and other successful mod motors, it reminds me of the engine ban we are discussing here. If the LSx is so superior (in their minds), why ban the modular? That's my main point.
I would say the LS is a better bang for the buck engine vs a mod motor, mostly because of junk yard pieces available and a cam swap can be done total for the price of 4 cams for a mod motor. but realistically the boltons for both are roughly the same, ported heads for a LS are cheap (mod motors don't really need ported heads), and they have the displacement advantage. also I think the biggest factor besides price is the fact that a LS motor will fit in almost anything, with a DOHC mod motor you need a wide engine bay, but when you equal things out in displacement and disregard pricing and are just trying to build the baddest small block available the DOHC mods win hands down, I have yet to see anyone build a nasty N/A LS smaller than 5L and produce the same numbers as the coyote. that would be interesting though.
I agree with everything you said here. LSx offers more bang for the buck. However, when money is no object, go modular. There is a local guy in my town with a LSx 468 CI build. It's hands down the most awesome NA LSx I have ever seen. Mounted in a 67 Camaro, it runs 6.1 in the 1/8th mile on engine only.
Sooo... why not have an LS class and a Mod class? Is that not the simplest solution?
because if they don't put a limit on the engines builders will come up with 454 cubic inch small blocks, at that point I guess they figure just do a big block and make the power, but Kasse has shown he can put Ford on top there as well.
Sooo... why not have an LS class and a Mod class? Is that not the simplest solution?
Playing devils advocate here, but the ability to extract lots of extra cubes out of the small block was a pretty significant feature that the LS series of engines always had. Limiting that put a big handcuff on the GM mils for sure. If they are able to do it, why not let them do it?
My main point is, while the outright elimination of the modular appears shady at best, there were already rules that limited every platform in one way or another.
Sooo... why not have an LS class and a Mod class? Is that not the simplest solution?
I kinda chuckled at the Coyote 5.0 versus GM LS3.
Link
"Current production OEM production passenger car 6.2LS3 and Ford Coyote 5.0 MOD motors to be specified. Normally aspirated. This class is going to be all about the top end as each competitor will be required to show up their parts ready to bolt on to a Hot Rod provided Short Block."
6.2 vs. 5.0
You know the provided short blocks will be stock CI. This is going to be comical! The 5.0 is going to make an ass out of the LS3, and at 1.2L less displacement.