Am I underspinning the blower?

GT 11B

New Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
17
Location
Charleston
i just recently picked up an 03 cobra. With a 3.4crusher that was recently put in. Also it was set up with 93 and e85. I've been reading about what amount of boost i should be putting out and what size pulley. But it's not adding up for my car. According to the boost guage I put out 16 lbs on a 3.5 in pulley. I think it's too low. What size pulley would I need to get to 24ish lbs? It has a stock lower and long tubes. Is under 20lbs underspinning blower? It puts out 576 rwhp on 93 and 682 on e85.
 

Bdubbs

u even lift bro?
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
16,096
Location
MN
Way to much blower for the boost level. I can't imagine it hits hard down low like a smaller blower would. personally I'd sell it and step down to a 2.9 whipple. Unless you have plans of building a motor for 25+ psi.
 

TRBO VNM

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
23,095
Location
Maryland
Unless you are running e85 all the time or higher octane unleaded/leaded fuel, the 3.4 is a waste of a blower for the street on 93. You would get more enjoyment from a 2.3 or 2.9. The 2.9 is probably about the largest I would even consider if I were running 93 and even then I wouldn't do it unless I could run e85 all the time.

What gauge are you looking at for the 16.5#? Are you sure that is accurate?
 

GodStang

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
14,723
Location
Aiken, SC
I have a buddy looking to trade for a 3.4L. He has a 2.8L with behemoth inlet. Great blower he is just built running E85 so the 2.8L is too small for him.
 

GT 11B

New Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
17
Location
Charleston
I run e85 when I can because it's cheaper but I think the tune isn't just right. And yes the bottom end torque sucks. I want to put it up to 24-26 but Idk if he motor can take it. I had a 2.3 whipple on my 05 and it was way more aggressive. I deffently would like to add more boost but don't want to blow the motor
 

Bdubbs

u even lift bro?
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
16,096
Location
MN
I run e85 when I can because it's cheaper but I think the tune isn't just right. And yes the bottom end torque sucks. I want to put it up to 24-26 but Idk if he motor can take it. I had a 2.3 whipple on my 05 and it was way more aggressive. I deffently would like to add more boost but don't want to blow the motor


My understanding is anything over 23 psi head studs are recommended.
 

MG0h3

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
13,946
Location
El Paso, TX
Im surprised youre only seeing 16 on a 3.5 at sea level. On manifolds it would be 17-18.

On my 2.9, the 3.5 was 17psi at sea level on manifolds.

If youre sure the gauge is correct, definitely pulley down and retune. Id try a 3" pulley. Probably put your around 21.
 

c6zhombre

E85 NutSwinger
Established Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
5,430
Location
League City, TX
All the 3.4 boost charts I found on line say the 3.4 whipple with a stock lower and 3.5 upper are suppose to be 23psi. That's a ton of boost for 93. You need secondary verification of what exact psi you are putting out if you are unsure that gauge is accurate. Most 93 octane setups I read say they run a 3.875 with stock lower. E85 could use the 3.5 or 3.25 upper.

Might be time for 2 retunes as well...one for the corn and one for the 93
 

MalcolmV8

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
7,353
Location
Tampa, FL
The 3.4 is to big for pump gas. Even my 2.9 crusher setup was a slouch on pump gas. The pulley / ported eaton setup prior was much more fun on pump gas.
The bigger blowers need some octane, race fuel, E85 etc. so you can crank up the boost and timing and then they come to life.
 

ctgreddy

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
4,166
Location
MI
I'd put another gauge on it and see what it says. We did a stock engine 3.4 crusher car that had a 6.55 lower(smaller than stock) and a 3.625 upper that made 20psi. On 93 it made 630. With a stock lower and 3.5 upper you should deff be seeing 22ish.
 

TRBO VNM

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2004
Messages
23,095
Location
Maryland
All the 3.4 boost charts I found on line say the 3.4 whipple with a stock lower and 3.5 upper are suppose to be 23psi. That's a ton of boost for 93. You need secondary verification of what exact psi you are putting out if you are unsure that gauge is accurate. Most 93 octane setups I read say they run a 3.875 with stock lower. E85 could use the 3.5 or 3.25 upper.

Might be time for 2 retunes as well...one for the corn and one for the 93

And this is why I was wondering about the gauge being used. I have never heard of a 3.4 being that low with the 3.5 pulley. I thought out of the box they were 20+. So right now I would say something else is up.

OP, what vacuum are you seeing? Are you sure of the pulley sizes? I know the whipple pulley is typically marked so I assume that is what you have, the lower pulley, are you sure it is stock?
 

MalcolmV8

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
7,353
Location
Tampa, FL
For reference my 2.9 Crusher setup on the stock 3.5" pulley with a stock lower made 20 PSI with stock manifolds. Your 3.4 should be more.
 

GT 11B

New Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
17
Location
Charleston
Well there is a dyno day this weekend. So I'll be able to tell exactly what numbers and what boost it puts out. According to the guage and the hand held tuner it says 16
 

stangfreak

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
8,433
Location
new york
3.4 whipple and pump gas dont belong in the same sentence. I don't even run my 2.9 on pump gas.

The 3.4 needs race gas or e85. e85 would be the ideal choice bc the 3.4 whipple, ran at its appropriate boost levels, creates a ton of heat. I dont care what people say that big blowers run cooler. No. e85 will manage the heat better.
 

MG0h3

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
13,946
Location
El Paso, TX
geez I missed the crusher part.

Something isnt right.........

You better take it easy til you figure out whats going on.
 

MG0h3

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
13,946
Location
El Paso, TX
Where is your digital gauge getting its ref? Stock MAP? Not entirely positive but I think they only are a 1bar. Maybe someone else can provide info.

Regardless, I would strongly suggest getting a mechanical gauge on there to confirm. You can just borrow or rent one and hook it up behind the dash.

The more info you provide the less things add up. Especially the part about running worse on E85. Only saying this because I dont know youre level of knowledge on the car but youre switching tunes with the handheld between 93 and E, right?
 

01yellercobra

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
21,323
Location
Cali
Where is your digital gauge getting its ref? Stock MAP? Not entirely positive but I think they only are a 1bar. Maybe someone else can provide info.

That's what my research showed. And that's why I went with the separate boost sensor for my Aeroforce.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top