Alright who is it?

[Black02GT]

Ya, Ford didn't screwup in the power department with the Ecoboost 2.3, 2.7 and 3.5. A local tuner here just posted a dyno graph of a 2.7 Ecoboost that put down 375/505 on a 93 tune. I don't recall if it had a downpipe but even if it did, that's pretty impressive.

I feel you though, other than my DD every vehicle purchase I make again will be based on the availability of aftermarket FI options.

Get silly toruque with a 3.5 and a e85 blend tune. 5.0 sounds nice and has overall more potenial but at <$1000 in mods the Eco wins.... sorry to say. Didn't want the the money pit of the mod path like my car. Love a 5.0 VMP or Whipple truck but overkill for my use.

 

[CompOrange04GT]

Lol he does look older than 47.

Here is a photo of Rob Lowe from 2021 at age 57, 10 years older than the rough looking dude! LOL Yeah we all don't age the same.

View attachment 1704237

shit look at Paul Rudd

that dude DOESNT age

 

[Deceptive]

Could have been delvin.a telling the officer he was a free range chicken being extorted by the federalies. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com

 

[03cobra#694]

Sad to say I love my Ecoboost 150. Hit speeds way higher than safe with a just a tune. Was thinking 5.0 but too much money in the 4.6 learned my lesson. Idea was buy the 3.5 tune and don't touch it after that. If I had a 5.0 I'd be looking VMP and money pit 2.0. Honestly big Ecoboost fan, more than enough for a DD F150.

No lie. I was semi unsure when I got my 2.7. It’s a little monster of an engine.