Who is running them and what spring rates - coil overs and/or regular springs?
Right now I am running 800-820 linear (calculated). thanks
pics
Right now I am running 800-820 linear (calculated). thanks
pics
Are you running them? 315s on the front is a bit much IMO.
Are you running them? 315s on the front is a bit much IMO.
actually i saw something pretty interesting on my first day of a road course, an instructor driving a c6 z06 was running 315 slicks all around and at some point he kept mentioning tires rubbing so for lunch he swapped out to 295 (dont know if it was just fronts 295 or rear also) but he shaved a second off his lap time.
his point that he was telling me was just because you have bigger tires doesnt mean you will any faster or grip better, there is a certain size that will be best and anything wider then that will make things worst.
295
255 /\ 315
kind of like that as he explained it to me, theres a low thats the worst, theres a perfect then things just go down.
i remember this thread on socalterminators where there was talk of putting 315 all corners, fwiw :beer:
http://www.socalterminators.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13283
I posted that over at socalterminators.com. I had to raise my car up a little but it is still about 1" lower then stock. I am running 400lb front coil-overs with ccw wheels with about 6 1/2 " backspacing with a 5/16 spacer to clear the brembo's. I have not found the limit of the front tires yet but they have improved the times by over 3 seconds. The rotating weight is lower with 315's
then stock wheels and 275's.
The rotating weight is lower because you went to a lighter rim. The rotating weight would be even lower if you ran a more narrow tire. Compound is the biggest factor when it comes to grip on a tire. Are you saying that anything less then a 315 on your front end will limit the performance of your car? In mustangs, the heavy front end will assist the front tires in gripping, while typically its the light rear ends we're more concerned about coming out from behind under us, hence the wider tires in the rear. I dont see the trouble of adding, and paying for an addition(?) inch or so of clearance and (?) in weight if its not needed.
I posted that over at socalterminators.com.
I posted that over at socalterminators.com. I had to raise my car up a little but it is still about 1" lower then stock. I am running 400lb front coil-overs with ccw wheels with about 6 1/2 " backspacing with a 5/16 spacer to clear the brembo's. I have not found the limit of the front tires yet but they have improved the times by over 3 seconds. The rotating weight is lower with 315's
then stock wheels and 275's.
I modified my bumper cover so that the front bottom edge is about 1 1/2" wider than stock (only after i hit something and broke the tabs that connect it to the fender). I have the 3/4" forward k-member but if you have the stock set-up you probably won't have a problem with front tire clearance. The cearance i have now with the 315's are as follows,
wheel straight ahead tire to front edge of fender 2 3/4"
" rear edge of fender 4"
passenger side wheel turned so that the wheel is closest to the
front edge of the fender clearance is 1"
rear edge of the fender cearance is 1 1/2 "