2015 irs

rrg9946

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
364
Location
Watching From the rooftops...
The 2015 Mustang’s new IRS carries upgraded rear-axle hardware. Dimensional and metallurgical torque-density improvements are said to give these assemblies the strength of a 9.75-inch diff, while still retaining the 8.8-inch ring gear diameter. Ford apparently internally refers to this as the “Super 8.8.” The diff carrier itself is made of iron on manual-gearbox cars, and aluminum (to save a little weight) with automatics. Oh, and all 2015 Mustangs will come standard with limited-slip diffs; with a Torsen being part of the GT Performance Package.



This might give an insight on how the rear end will handle drag strip duty.
 
Last edited:

sunburned

I miss my torque
Established Member
Joined
May 17, 2005
Messages
13,841
Location
NoVA
Jeep did it with the JK, created a tougher version of the Dana 44. Of course, they actually made the gearset bigger, as well as the entire axle assembly. Hope this holds up for Ford. I know the 8.8 is strong, but isn't it time to step it up a notch, especially with stuff like the GT500 putting out damn near 700hp?
 

DHG1078

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Established Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
9,368
Location
So Cal
Jeep did it with the JK, created a tougher version of the Dana 44. Of course, they actually made the gearset bigger, as well as the entire axle assembly. Hope this holds up for Ford. I know the 8.8 is strong, but isn't it time to step it up a notch, especially with stuff like the GT500 putting out damn near 700hp?

Are people with over 700 rwhp breaking them (serious question)? If not then I don't really see a reason to. It would cost us more money, probably add weight, and add zero benefits.
 

specizripn

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
589
Location
St Louis Mo
I think the concern is more traction related, and then once you get traction, half shaft related... The Cobras were notorious for wheel hopping and snapping a half shaft...
 

04svtsnke

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
2,154
Location
Winston Salem
I think the concern is more traction related, and then once you get traction, half shaft related... The Cobras were notorious for wheel hopping and snapping a half shaft...

This isn't 2004. Don't get me wrong, there will be half shafts breaking, but I'm sure ford has went over and above to make sure this wasn't a failure like the stock irs in the cobras.
 

kino

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2002
Messages
324
Location
louisiana
Back then the 03-04 cobras were using a makeshift irs on a platform that never was intended on using an irs. I think the irs won't be the issue. Course there will be a learning curve buts that's to be expected.
 

steeltoe

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2005
Messages
3,956
Location
Washington, DC
Jeep did it with the JK, created a tougher version of the Dana 44. Of course, they actually made the gearset bigger, as well as the entire axle assembly. Hope this holds up for Ford. I know the 8.8 is strong, but isn't it time to step it up a notch, especially with stuff like the GT500 putting out damn near 700hp?

The 9.75 was in the Lightning and most lightning guys don't even touch the rear end other then to change gears and/or diff.
 

Tob

Salut!
Super Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
12,254
Location
The Ville
Ford engineers saw a need to upgrade. We should be thankful not only for the fact that they upgraded the internals but for the reason that necessitated the change in the first place.
 

twistedneck

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Messages
1,143
Location
Dearborn, MI
Ford engineers saw a need to upgrade. We should be thankful not only for the fact that they upgraded the internals but for the reason that necessitated the change in the first place.

yea because its gets hotter than hell and needs to be larger to dissipate the heat in the IRS. IMO there is not a torque reason for this, the 8.8 was never weak.. at least I don't remember seeing many broken units. I bet its also a structural member now.
 

Charlington

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
208
Location
Texas
2015 Mustang IRS is a huge improvement.

Heavy Duty Rigid Explorer style Diff Cover
Moved Coil Sprngs behind the Axles to help kill wheelhop
Lincoln style IRS Subframe for easy install/removal/stability
Easy Access Drain Plug
Massive Control Arms

I'll take a Dozen!
 

SonicDTR

Wasn't me.
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2007
Messages
5,244
Location
Midwest
Jeep did it with the JK, created a tougher version of the Dana 44. Of course, they actually made the gearset bigger, as well as the entire axle assembly. Hope this holds up for Ford. I know the 8.8 is strong, but isn't it time to step it up a notch, especially with stuff like the GT500 putting out damn near 700hp?

Same thing with a Dana "Super" 60...

Good to see the new IRS appearing quite beefy, look forward to seeing real world results!
 

dom418

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
2,120
Location
Bloomingdale, IL
This isn't 2004. Don't get me wrong, there will be half shafts breaking, but I'm sure ford has went over and above to make sure this wasn't a failure like the stock irs in the cobras.


Exactly! Why do people assume that ford has made zero advancements since 2004? The new stang wont have the same issues as the Terminator .
 

SID297

OWNER/ADMIN
Administrator
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
55,753
Location
Myrtle Beach, SC
Exactly! Why do people assume that ford has made zero advancements since 2004? The new stang wont have the same issues as the Terminator .

It's just ignorance to think it won't be improved vs. a 15+ year old design in a chassis from the late 70's.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top