Good point, many of these super cars with v12s and flat and v10s have firing orders that make them sound like 6 and 5 cylinder cars.
I think this new V6 sounds great!:rockon:
'11 V6 Mustang vs '03 2V Mustang GT
- Thread starter chrisheltra
- Start date
Good point, many of these super cars with v12s and flat and v10s have firing orders that make them sound like 6 and 5 cylinder cars.
I think this new V6 sounds great!:rockon:
I need boost
Just speaking for myself, but I don't necessarily see it as a compromise, but no matter what I just can't call it a "muscle car" like I would consider most V8 Mustangs (with exceptions of the 70's, lol). Call me old school or whatever, but a V6 being a muscle car just doesn't taste right.
Not saying I wouldn't drive one, own one, or like ones other people drive alot, cause they amaze me with the versatility and power they produce.
I guess to me it's like a salad. I like salad alot and eat them all the time, you can even add meat or anything else you want to add to it to be more filling, nothing wrong with it at all. But it's never going to fill me up like a steak, chicken, pasta, etc. would.
I wish they would put the Ecoboost 6er in it.
Just when you think the 2v mustangs was about as slow as it can be then a V6 mustang comes along and beats it and makes it even slower
Good luck with that one, my stock motor n/a 123k mile LS1 is low 12s on a shitty 255 DR.
My bad, I didn't realize you were the creator of the term, which appears
to be open to subjectivity.
(quick search from dictionary.com)
–noun
a flashy sports car with a large, powerful engine; a hot rod
I understand that when speaking of specific eras, muscle cars are typically those of the late 60's into very early 70's, but I was speaking of the general definition of one. Either way, I think I made my point.
oke:Users who are viewing this thread
