New mustangs might be faster but ill take the sound of the '96-2004 2v & 4v over the 11's anyday
This.
New mustangs might be faster but ill take the sound of the '96-2004 2v & 4v over the 11's anyday
glad im blown LOL
same here.. cam/longtube ls1's are a dime a dozen in my area. Only 2 or 3 that I know of have ran 12's. 90% go 13.0-13.1. The MPH well, but never set the car up to hook, or bitch about having a weak rear end.
id be pissed to run low 13's with 400rwhp. lol
So you would own a slower V8?
I would personally. Would you own an older 289 Mustang? There are faster Mustangs out there. SVO? 289 isn't the fastest car in the Mustang stable, but I'd rock it over a faster V-6 or SVO. It's not always about speed in my book. As time goes on, technology makes the smaller motors more powerful, but it doesn't take away from what the V8 car is. I still like the new sixes though! I just wouldn't be embarrassed to have a slower V8 personally.
A performance enthusiast shouldn't base their likings solely on the exhaust note out back. That's a bit redneck if you ask me. It's not 1985 anymore.
I just got a 2011 Grabber Blue automatic v6. I love this car. It's smooth, comfortable, has great gas mileage and does have nice acceleration. I'm very happy with this car.
-J