Man prepare to hail mary this one, but I can already tell it will bomb and end up on Disney+ faster then any movie in history.Hope it will be good.
Man prepare to hail mary this one, but I can already tell it will bomb and end up on Disney+ faster then any movie in history.Hope it will be good.
I like paul rud so it has great potential. Strange Hollywood made this after the dumpster fire the last one was.
The most recent Ghostbusters was a masterpiece that failed because of the sexist patriarchy.
LOL. I thought the humor was actually pretty good, and the entertainment value was underrated.
But, I agree that the Hollywood agenda far outweighed any good to that movie.
That movie produced far more cringes than laughs. .
I hope the ghosts in this new one don't look cartoony like the 2016 one. The "Terror Dog" foot looked legit, but that green glow in the mine shaft was suspect.
You are by far the most pessimistic person when it comes to movies I’ve ever seen.Man prepare to hail mary this one, but I can already tell it will bomb and end up on Disney+ faster then any movie in history.
The original Ghostbusters ghosts weren't the pinnacle of frightening either....
I'll go to see this one- looks better than the last at least!!
Somebody cut the original theme song into the end of the trailer. Upped the nostalgia hit a bit.
They had a much more physical presence than the 2016 version because they were rotoscoped puppets. Sometimes those old practical effects are better.
With 1080p on up the older practical effects just dont look good. I think the only movie that blended both together that still works today was the original Jurassic Park. The 2016 effects while not good and were very cartoonish were not bad and i think fit with the style the movie was trying to portray.
I will say that the newer CGI is absolutely garbage and can look worse without a massive budget for doing it correctly. 99% of movies that use CGI these days screw it up.
I hope with the "dog" foot that hit the hood of the car in the trailer is an indication that they maybe went both practical effects and CGI like JP. Crossing my fingers.
...hell, i'm just happy if they make ANY movie today without a feminism/woke cast! I grew up on stallone, schwarzenegger, van damme and segal. Now, I get 19 year old 5'2 chicks with man haircuts, who they want us to believe can take on the world but in all reality probably have trouble waking up before noon everyday!
I concur with your guesstimate, Jeff. LOL. Yeah, it's probably gonna be a disappointment! The special effects will be better, of course, but the story itself, without the original cast members? I'm not expecting much.It's going to. If the original surviving 3 only have a cameo, I am out. It isn't Ghostbusters without Ray, Peter and Winston. Heck, I would take the ghost of Egon. Based on this taking place at Ray's family farm house that he took a 2nd mortgage out on to fund the original Ghostbusters, I am going to wager that he is the dead grandfather. It could be Egon, but that wouldn't match up too well with canon. I am hoping for more, but I feel like this is going to be a let down. Sort of like Star Wars with no ultra powerful Luke being the main focus.... Oh wait, we did get that shit.
I submit the original Alien and the first Predator for your consideration. A man in a rubber suit can still look awesome. If you want to see some great puppet work watch the first Terminator.
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app