I liked it. Better than the alternative, Beyance, lady gaga, etc...
It was great. I am a big WHO fan so I guess thats why I enjoyed it. Its a shame to say I knew all the words to all the songs they played.
the who is one of the greatest and most underrated rock bands of all time. Their performance was great for a couple of 65yr old guys. I'd rather watch a weaker performance by the who than 99% of the crap that passes for rock&roll on the radio right now.
Shouldv'e had Black Eyed Peas. Any of you who have seen their 30 mins MTV in Europe special on MHD (Palladia) would know they can rock a crowd and they have had an amazing year whether you care for them or not. And they were at the Super Bowl!! From a friend who was working the event Fergie was torn up by the end of the game. God only knows what kind of fine CBS may have gotten if she had performed.....
It was great. I am a big WHO fan so I guess thats why I enjoyed it. Its a shame to say I knew all the words to all the songs they played.
I thought it was terrible, but...you're never gonna be able to please everyone. As someone kinda mentioned earlier, it's 2010, I think whoever performs needs to be somewhat new and cutting edge, whether it be rock, rap, country or a mixture. But come on, The Who? Their superbowl performance should have come in the 70's.
I thought they were great. The majority of the yahoos that they have had before (6 out of the last 7 half time shows) get up there and lip sing to a CD. The Who said they would do it only if they could play it live.
The "newer" generation does not respect that anymore because they don't listen to actual bands any longer. They are satisfied with some over dubed fake computer generated crap, and it is a shame. Yes they are old, but they played more "music" during the halftime show than most of todays entertainers will play in their lifetime.