Shooting a 370Z tomorrow

[JohnFrancis]

As some of you know, i do commercial photography for Performance Auto And Sound magazine based out of Canada, tomorrow i am doing my first photo gig with a 370Z for a magazine called 0-60 (based out of NYC/NY).

I guess the car looks like this, i haven't even seen one in person yet:
(Wish me luck on this one).

 

[crazyj0n]

Does taking the picture void the warranty?

 

[XyX]

Do me a favor and throw up on it bc it's ugly

 

[CalcVictim]

good luck, wish it had no fangs

 

[thomas91169]

Hope you are shooting it with a gatling gun, put that design out of its misery.

good luck, wish it had no fangs

yeah i dunno what designer thought fangs would be a good look, but they need to be fired. also the headlight/taillight body penetrations, wtf.

370Z = fail IMO.

 

[tvguy]

From that angle, the back end of that car drops off in an odd way. Funky looking. Any power numbers? Rough job by the way to the OP. Are models included as well in the shoot?
PACOTACO

 

[JohnFrancis]

From that angle, the back end of that car drops off in an odd way. Funky looking. Any power numbers? Rough job by the way to the OP. Are models included as well in the shoot?
PACOTACO

I don't have any stats on the car and there won"t be any models this time around. From what i gather it's going to be focused more on action shots than anything else (sideways/rolling shots etc.), i meet with the writer that flew in from new york in the AM to discuss the gameplan. (0-60 magazine).

From posting up on as many car forums as i do, it seems that the common consensus is that most folks hate the new body styling with a passion, just work for me really, love cars and trucks but never been a Nissan fan.

 

[wurd2]

Does taking the picture void the warranty?

You win.

:burnout:

.

 

[Riddla]

From that angle, the back end of that car drops off in an odd way. Funky looking. Any power numbers? Rough job by the way to the OP. Are models included as well in the shoot?
PACOTACO

I did a thread about that car awhile ago.

3.7 V6- 332 HP and 270tq

outstanding for the sixer

 

[32ValveRom]

^ An NA sixer to be exact. Car looks too much live the previous model IMO

 

[crew_dawg16]

"More sportier"?? Who is writing these adds?

 

[blueovalfan]

Use this.

 

[Jroc]

The car is pretty damn fugly. I imagen it handles pretty nicely though.

 

[Black Talon]

Use this.

:lol1:

 

[Wintermute]

I did a thread about that car awhile ago.

3.7 V6- 332 HP and 270tq

outstanding for the sixer

Yeah but it was already at 306 with 3.5L. Why did they increase displacement for 26hp and no torque increase ?

 

[greenstang1313]

I dont like the headlights

 

[FromGTtoSVT]

looks aside the performance numbers speak for themselves...it's an impressive car across the board. Outperforms the current Mustang GT

 

[Riddla]

Yeah but it was already at 306 with 3.5L. Why did they increase displacement for 26hp and no torque increase ?

My guess would be more torque under the curve

 

[Solopony]

I don't have any stats on the car and there won"t be any models this time around. From what i gather it's going to be focused more on action shots than anything else (sideways/rolling shots etc.), i meet with the writer that flew in from new york in the AM to discuss the gameplan. (0-60 magazine).

From posting up on as many car forums as i do, it seems that the common consensus is that most folks hate the new body styling with a passion, just work for me really, love cars and trucks but never been a Nissan fan.

So do you get a stunt driver too?

 

[04svtterm]

i am actually starting to like it. more and more i look at it..just grew on me.