Reichard Racings new 2.65 03 cobra pully

SVTim

Beer Me!
Established Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2005
Messages
912
Location
so cal
there were a couple of threads about but i couldnt find anybody that had any results. There was a little more information about on mod fords.

I am probably going to be swapping out my 2.8 for the 2.65. im currently at 13lbs so i plan that bringing me up to around 15.
 

wheelhopper

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Messages
6,640
Location
Southern MD
The smaller you go, the more likely you will get some belt slip. I think I would just install a 2# lower. As a matter of fact that is what I did.
 

dougwg

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2002
Messages
10,846
Location
Taylor,MI
We are testing the 2.65 interchangable rings right now....

Much cheaper then doing a lower and it only takes 5 min's to install.....if you already have a BilletFlow hub.
 

SicStang03

2SSSlow
Established Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
4,500
Location
Atlanta
wheelhopper said:
The smaller you go, the more likely you will get some belt slip. I think I would just install a 2# lower. As a matter of fact that is what I did.


I wouldn't go that route...

You will peg your BAP and MAF quicker with a lower, not to mention you will need a alt. pulley to.

Although Tq. #'s will be better i would imagine
 

CobraBob

Authorized Vendor
Established Member
Premium Member
Single Barrel Sirs
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
105,726
Location
Cheshire, CT
Either way works fine, although adding a larger lower usually yields more torque. It is more a personal preference. There are many here who swear by the upper/lower combo. Others prefer to go with the smallest upper available. Pick your poison. ;-)
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top